Volvo AWD 850 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2005 850 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

'95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

Hello- I was just wondering why I sometimes see '96 850s that have a build date as early as 6/95 when they were actually produced as '96 models. I can tell that a major difference between 1995 and 1996 850s is in the inside, where the switch labeled "LOCK" (for power locks) is located to the right of the headlight switch. That can obviously be found in '96 cars, and never '95s.

The latest '95 models I've personally seen have build dates of 5/95. Once they go to, say, 6/95 through 8/95, I definitely can tell it's a '96. I always thought about why Volvo Cars decided to start the 1996 model year early...maybe it's because they wanted to install OBD-II wiring in the 850 series. I have noticed that the company has been starting model years really early in recent times. For example, the '04 models started production in March of 2003, while the '06 models began in May 2005 (same as aforementioned '96 models). To me, it's a phenomena I can't explain. (lol)








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

    At Volvo the last month for the current year production is May. Starting in June its on to the next year. Its been that way for at least 20 years over there.






    Mike
    '95 850T (5/95)








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

    At least as far back as the 50's Detroit always shut down production of the prior model sometime in the summer for vacation shut down and retooling. You could only buy what had been built before the shutdown until the "new" model was released for sale in late Sept. or Oct., and the new model was always sold as the next calender year's model (built in Sept. 65, sold as a '66). Europe followwed a similar schedule. Nothing new about this. Even very early (spring?)introductions in the "prior" calendar year are not particularly new, although the practice seems to be getting more use recently, for other reasons.
    --
    Mike Sullivan ('95 855T (88k), '98 V70XC (92k), '95 855 NA (135k). Past Volvo's: '85 744 (256k), '86 245 (165k), '86 245 (195k), '88 745 (208k), '91 745 (196k), '93 965 (147k) .








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

    Hey Juan P, didnt you used to have a 93 850, I am driving a saab 9-5 now
    sold both the volvos, just test drove a 03 v7 xc, thinking about a s60 r
    just thought I lurk the 850 site








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

    GM just announced the 2007 model year for sale this month for Suburban/Tahoe trucks. Seems the 2006 line wasn't selling enough, or they are having troubles meeting CAFE standards again.

    The only frustrating thing with Volvo is they will run out of parts during the model year and upgrade to new parts. That is why my V70 has a 70K Tbelt and others have a 105K Tbelt. Same for the brake pads. It is hard to order parts online when they need to know the serial number, because nnnnn+1 means newer design.

    Klaus
    --
    (V♂LV♂s 1975 164, 1995 854T, 1998 V70R)








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

    mainly cos they make em before they sell em!

    sounds trite but to a degree its true....

    the build year is a pretty movable feast, dont forget some other countries have registration changes in mid year eriods and they want new model out for hte new reg (used to be august in the UK for example).

    it also partly becasue it takes a while to retool a line so they wil build a load, park em up to cover demand then retool and start production so they pick convenient time of year...

    you will also find 'weird' cars with bits that were only on earlier models (or later) officially jsut due to the fact that stock bins get used out so a new part may be used (they aint going to order in load of the old ones) or because they had x thousand parts left...)

    also dont forget same car introduced in different territorys at different dates..

    me i would rather have the 95 and avoid the obdII misery but each to his own...








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

      Well, concerning not having to deal with the OBD 2 system...my '95 850 wagon has both the DLC and OBD2. My local volvo shop seemed a little surprised. I've just been using the DLC so as to avoid purchasing a scan tool to trouble shoot prior to making repairs, and the black button under the rubber plug in the guage shield by the speedo to reset the service reminder light. So far so good.








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        '95 850 vs. '96 850 850 1996

        My '95 has both diagnostic systems as well, and both are active. I have used both circuits to read and reset engine codes. Another way to avoid the cost of a scanner is to check out the tool from an autoparts store (i.e. Autozone). They require a deposit, usually the price of the tool. I check it out with my debit card, read the code in the parking lot, turn the tool back in, and they immediately credit the money back to my account.
        --
        Ten Sleep 1980 245DL 1995 850 Turbo







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.