posted by
someone claiming to be Ken
on
Thu Oct 26 00:29 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
I was looking at the site
http://www.usatoday.com/money/consumer/autos/mauto696.htm
to see how bad my Suburban rated and noticed that Volvos are not the best. It is strange that Cadillacs are better than a Volvo. I thought the a large part of the Volvo safety was the evasive manuvers to avoid and collision, that won't help if your car tips over.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be mark t
on
Thu Oct 26 09:10 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
I watched the rollover piece last night on MSNBC, and found it very interesting. They talked about two lists of rollover probability, one based on a mathematical formula based on the design of the vehicle, and one based on historic accident rates. Neither are public knowledge, and the lobbiests for the auto manufactures are working to keep this data hidden.
Based on the reference information on this table, this is data based on the mathematical formula. And this is not likely based on reality, which was acknowledged on the MSNBC program.
Look at the data. I recently bought a new Corvette, which is the best handling stock automobile for sale in the US, able to create lateral g force in excess of 1g. It also has very advance traction and yaw control. I've never felt more in control of an automobile. Yet the Vette is beat out in this study by a Crown Vic with soft suspension. Why? Maybe it's because the Vette is capable of 175 mph, and the Crown Vic is probably limited to 90 mph. Yet I believe that if applied to the exact same scenario, the Vette would be less likely to roll.
Volvos of late have become increasingly performance oriented. Without knowing the specific algorithm, I would guess that they took performance orientation into account, and penalized those cars because they're more likely to be driven closer to the edge.
I don't think Volvos are very likely to roll at all, and are less likely to roll than many other vehicles, including John O's Regal!
(BTW, I have a Suburban too, and was glad to see that it rated higher than other SUVs)
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Ken
on
Thu Oct 26 23:37 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
The numbers are somewhat meaningless. They do not take into acount what kind of suspension the car has. It sounds like a really rough calcutation based on the center of gravity , the wheelbase and the wieght. I love those new corvettes and I have been tempted to buy one. If I could only figure out how to afford a new one without selling my old one. Even my wife wants me to buy one , an automatic, because the other vette is a standard.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Uncle Olaf
on
Thu Oct 26 08:00 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
....the "Transportation Analysis Institute". I appreciate that the Volvo scores "worse" than the Cadillac.
The Volvo also supposedly scores "better" than the Porsche Boxster and the BMW Z3, both cars with VERY low centers of gravity, so the entire hypothesis that this index actually contains meaningful information is highly suspect.
When I took the Skip Barber high performance driving course a couple of years ago, a large part of the course was devoted to skid control. The vehicles they used for this were Dodge pickup trucks with bald rear tires. All that would ever happen is that we'd spin out and slide to a halt in the far reaches of the skidpad. The instructors unequivocally stated that NO ONE at any one of their courses -which are given all over the country - had EVER managed to roll one of the pickups. They further unequivocally stated that, no hatter WHAT you do to the steering wheel, it is IMPOSSIBLE to roll any car or truck made today unless you do something like hit a curb, Jersey barrier, or another vehicle. Skid, yes, but not roll over. Recall also that most of the news photos of the inverted Explorers seem to show that they've left the pavement.
I saw the "Dateline" piece on rollovers on MSNBC last night. They supplied a handy rollover calculator (avaliable below) which seems to show that trucks will roll over more easily than cars (DUH!).
Seems NHTSA wants to require a rollover rating system, one to five stars, presumably to be put on the window sticker with the EPA fuel economy numbers.
-Uncle Olaf
'98 V70T5M 53k mi., IPD stabilizer bars, Volvo strut tower brace and skidplate, Valentine One, Dunlop SP8000s
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be dave
on
Thu Oct 26 21:12 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
> They further unequivocally stated that, no hatter WHAT you
> do to the steering wheel, it is IMPOSSIBLE to roll any car or truck
> made today unless you do something like hit a curb, Jersey barrier,
> or another vehicle. Skid, yes, but not roll over.
Driving instructors!
In a recent AutoWeak AutoFile test, they reported a surprisingly high
slalom speed for a BMW X5, but admitted they'd gotten the thing up on
2 wheels (tires) in doing so...
And we've all seen the now-[in]famous video of Consumer Reports getting
tipsy in the Suzuki Samurai.
Thursday, Car and Driver held a news conference regarding their tests with
a Ford Exploder rigged to suddenly deflate a rear tire. They calmly and
professionally and expertly debunked the myth that such a condition is
any big deal. But there was never any actual tread separation to help
launch that corner of the truck.
In the hands of a panicked driver traversing surfaces of mixed traction
and elevations, out of control, "IMPOSSIBLE" is not the word I'd use to
describe the probability of a rollover.
> Recall also that
> most of the news photos of the inverted Explorers seem to show that
> they've left the pavement
That can't happen in skid class, but out in the real world... Maybe they
meant their "IMPOSSIBLE" remark to pertain to continuous relatively smooth
pavement?
I noticed the C70 was rated more likely to roll than the S70. Methinks
they included some insurance company information (biases about who drives
what cars how [fast]) in ranking various models.
- Dave; '95 854T, 101K mi

|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Uncle Olaf
on
Thu Oct 26 23:57 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
Since on the "Fun to Drive" scale, I'd rank a Lotus Elise at about a "10", a Volvo turbo at about a "7", and a Ford Excursion at about a "Minus 10".
Skip Barber uses Dodge pickups (and Neons, and Vipers); not SUVs.
Still, I suspect the old "driver error" when the tire blows, since I'd estimate that less than 1% of all drivers have ever taken a skid control course.
The tort lawyers surely will tell us where the fault lies before this is all over.
Maybe the Algore administration should require additional licensing of SUV drivers, like most states do for motorcycle/commercial drivers now!
-Uncle Olaf
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Ray Niblett
on
Thu Oct 26 06:52 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
The data is based on predictions (not actual recorded accidents).
I assume they use the vehicle center of gravity, weight, etc.
In fact, this might just be a list sorted by center of gravity
(remove the sunroof and I wonder what happens to the placement
in this list). Heck, maybe Volvo has more material in the roof
to protect in a roll and that moves the center of gravity up.
I believe Volvo investigates real world accidents and Volvo
engineers use that data for automobile design (as well as calculated
data, I'm sure).
I think if the numbers are posted they should post how they are
calculated and the range of accuracy of the predictions (like a
poll does, +/- 4%, etc.).
I'm also not sure what it means to say an Explorer has a 22% chance
of rolling. Does this mean that 1 in 5 accidents with an Explorer
result in the thing rolling? Or if you run off the road into a
ditch you have a 22% chance of rolling?
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Nathaniel Beck
on
Thu Oct 26 06:36 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
Thanks for the URL.
Quick look shows that chance of rollover for a car is more or less directly proportional to weight. Presumably most cars have pretty similar profiles.
Neal
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Kino Velez
on
Thu Oct 26 05:31 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
The teenage son of a friend of mine rolled over, at high speed a 1993 245 on a dirt road, and ended with one cut in his arm, which was self inflicted while trying to get out of the wagon. Insurance totaled the wagon but the kid is alive.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be John O
on
Thu Oct 26 00:55 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
In my almost 30 yrs of driving, I've not once ever come close to rolling a car over so it's not anything I'd even consider really.
Those who I know have done it were wasted on something (not sober).
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Peter Cohen
on
Thu Oct 26 05:59 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
Yeah, but you're a guy. :-)
About 2 years ago, someone cut off a grandma driving a Lexus LS400 on the freeway, and she panicked and managed to get the car upside down, fatally injuring her 12 year old granddaughter.
Actually, reports of rollovers are commonplace on the morning traffic reports here the San Francisco Bay area. They usually don't say what the vehicles are. I often wonder how you can roll a car in commute traffic, but I would speculate that the scenario goes something like this:
1. Bay Area traffic has become hideous, so that people get up earlier and earlier to avoid the crunch. Result- lots of sleep deprived drivers.
2. SUVs extremely popular.
3. Half asleep driver is crusing along at 55-60 and suddenly comes upon stopped traffic. Can't stop in time, swerves. Over they go.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be John O
on
Thu Oct 26 06:31 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
OK, that's true as I've seen some early morning cars flipped too BUT IF you're awake AND paying attention, you should be able to avoid that IMHO.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Ken
on
Thu Oct 26 01:42 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
I never had an airbag deploy or known anyone who has ever had one deploy.So I guess that I don't really need airbags. I am just kidding but I was surprised that the other cars were ranked better than Volvo. I am not at all worried about my Volvo rolling over. The Cadillacs and the other cars must be wider and have a lower center of gravity.
|
|
-
posted by
someone claiming to be Jeff S
on
Thu Oct 26 01:15 CST 2000 [ RELATED]
|
Or hit by someone, but I was in an explorer. It looked just like the tv news shows that have been showing the stability tests of various SUV's lately. A couple of swerves and over you go.
|
|
|
|
|