Volvo AWD 850 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 1/2009 850 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

S60 Test drives 850 95

I haven't seen many comments on the S60 here. I test drove the T-5 and 2.4T this weekend.

The T-5 engine seems about the same as my '95 Turbo, with even more turbo lag (maybe that'll get better when broken in). The torque steer is much worse, the sport seat didn't fit me real well (head rest hits me between the shoulders) and there isn't much room for my big feet between the console and brake pedal. I'd have to drive the geartronic more to decide on that. On the plus side, I really like the looks and there is a substantial improvment in handling.

I like the 2.4T better overall. The standard seats fit me better, and there is little noticable turbo lag. It seems it would be more enjoyable to drive in traffic where I unfortunately am stuck much of the time. The power overall is plenty to have a little fun with, though not near up to the T-5 level.

I'll consider the 2.4T when I replace my car, but will take a hard look at low mileage used A6, or a Passat.

Anyone bought an S60 yet and drive enough to get an impression on quality or problem areas?








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

    SteveT wrote:

    > The T-5 engine seems about the same as my '95 Turbo, with even more

    > turbo lag (maybe that'll get better when broken in). The torque steer

    > is much worse,

    Is there anyone here who knows what "Torque Steer" really is???

    I see this all the time from many BBers and wonder if they really know what it is that they're feeling. In the case of the new S60 it sure as hell ISN'T torque steer!!

    Having driven both the 2.4T AND T5 (in both manual and automatic for the T5) I can assure all of you that what you claim to be torque steer IS NOT! I had the T5 manual at a standstill on perfectly flat pavement and I hammered it off the line. This car pulled as straight and true as a yard stick. I've done the same with the auto and had the same result.

    What everyone here seems to mistake for torque steer is what I like to call "train tracking". The new S60 is the widest car in its class and with 235/45ZR17s on all four corners it's extremely susceptable to following imperfections within the roadway itself. It's especially nasty when it gets caught in the train tracks. You know, the two linear depressions in the pavement where most cars travel and as such cause 2 indentations within each lane. If you've ever tried to make a quick lane change on deeply tracked roads with wide tires then you know what I'm referring to. Most intersections will have these ruts so that when you go to hit the gas you will feel the car pull back into them if you're not in them already. This may leave you feeling like torque steer is effecting the steering but in reality, on a truly flat surface, the car GOES STRAIGHT AS AN ARROW!

    You people want to observe torque steer? Take a spin in a 1994 (or previous MY) Cavalier Z24 (3.1L V6 FWD). Hit one of these hard off the line and you'll end up in the next lane regardless of how flat the surface is and remember that on any given FWD application, if it's torque steer that you're observing it should ALWAYS pull in only ONE direction (whichever side has the shorter driveshaft typically).








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

      Well VolvoFan, I'm sure you're an expert, but I'll disagree. Some preformance tires will follow imperfections in the pavement. Torque steer comes in under hard acceleration. That's where I felt it in the S60 T-5. I drove it on some rough pavement and when cruising it tracked well.

      And it's not a Cavalier were talking about here, it's a $37k performance car. Whatever you want to call it, I don't think one should have to continuously fight the car and make corrections to the wheel...it should go where it's pointed. If you want comparisons, try a BMW with low profile tires. You won't find any problem with it trying to steer right or left on acceleration.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

      Have yet to drive the new S60 but as to my own experience with my 850 Turbo, I have to agree, there IS torque-steer. Yes yes, I know what you mean when you refer to "train-tracking" and in most instances, the torque-steer produced isn't that big an issue. I don't know if they managed to improve on this area with the newer S70 and now S60 but I've noticed it in my own driving. It's not always there, just in certain situations and it isn't enough to bother me but for the unsuspecting driver, it could startle him or her.








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

        Agree. There is a fair degree of torque steer on my 850T5 wagon too but only when I kick down hard ie. drop 2 gears at low speed. Tell me this isn't t-steer: I kick down (auto box) and find myself "fighting" with my steering wheel which wants to go left and right till the tires get a good grip. Oh, and that happened once while taking a corner and I practically scared myself silly!

        On the train-tracking - I'm more familiar with the phrase "tram-lining" but same thing - it doesnt affect my wagon with standard 205/50ZR16 tires.

        jeff

        95 850T5 wagon Auto, SAM chip, full Supersprint exos (no cat), IPD swaybars









        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

          jeff yeoh wrote:

          > Agree. There is a fair degree of torque steer on my 850T5 wagon too

          > but only when I kick down hard ie. drop 2 gears at low speed. Tell me

          > this isn't t-steer: I kick down (auto box) and find myself

          > "fighting" with my steering wheel which wants to go left

          > and right till the tires get a good grip.

          THAT'S NOT TORQUE STEER!!! All you're doing in what you describe is feeling one tire get a little more traction than the other while they're both slipping as you have an open diff.

          Flat surface, hands off the wheel, punch it. Does the car go left or right AND CONSISTENTLY IN ONLY ONE DIRECTION?? If you answered yes you may then declare TORQUE STEER.

          It's funny really. I'm positive that 50% of journalists can't properly define this term either.









          •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

            Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

            Volvofan,

            To answer the question - no, it doesnt go consistently in any one direction. I guess it just doesnt have enuff grip like you said, resulting in alternate slippage Left and Right tires.

            Hmm, you're right after all. Thanks for the correction, volvofan & John B. Learned sumthing new today ... :-)

            Now to the other point as described by derspi. I think it IS a problem for Turbo FWD volvos not to have sufficient grip on low-speed pick-up. Anyone with 215/45 17 tires care to comment whether you experience massive slippage in these circumstances, cos I don't see how else one can overcome this problem short of getting fatter tires. Not that I would want lower profile tires, the stock ride is harsh enuff as it is already

            jeff

            95 850T5 wagon Auto, SAM chip, full S/sprint exos (no cat), IPD swaybars









          •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

            Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

            Does it really really matter what you want to call it? The fact of the matter is, the car is steering or behaving unexpectedly and this can be cause for concern for some people. I don't know the exact, precise definition of torque-steer but I do know what tires slipping due to poor traction feel (and sometimes, sound) like.

            If you can, feel free to enlighten us with a proper definition. And if it is indeed a topic of debate even among journalists and car techs then what makes your definition the absolute, correct one?








            •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

              Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

              derspi wrote:

              > Does it really really matter what you want to call it?

              Well usually people want to hear the correct answer when they participate in a forum such as this so I'll have to say, YES. It really DOES matter what I want to call it!!

              > The fact of

              > the matter is, the car is steering or behaving unexpectedly and this

              > can be cause for concern for some people. I don't know the exact,

              > precise definition of torque-steer but I do know what tires slipping

              > due to poor traction feel (and sometimes, sound) like.

              And I'm sure if the rear end let loose when you goosed a Camaro V8 with an open diff, THAT would be torque steer too? I mean, it does cause the car to turn (spin) in one direction or the other depending on which tire has more traction. Much the same as has already been described in your FWD experiences.

              > If you can, feel free to enlighten us with a proper definition.

              Sure thing. Read below.

              > And

              > if it is indeed a topic of debate even among journalists and car

              > techs then what makes your definition the absolute, correct one?

              Probably the fact that Journalists usually don't know their ass from a hole in the ground but that's another story. Most tech will know what it is though.

              Well let's see. Torque and steer. Torque that induces unintended steering effects in an otherwise perfectly aligned steering/suspesion setup due to uneven application to the front tires of the vehicle usually induced by asymmetric driveshafts.

              Picture two pieces of tubing. They're the same diameter, the same material and the same density. They are however different lengths. Fix them on one end to prevent any rotation of the shaft. Now, on the other end, apply a fixed amount of torque to each of the two shafts. The shorter shaft will resist twisting less than the longer shaft because its length makes it more torsionally rigid. Think about golf clubs. If you made a shaft 44" (standard driver) and put a specific amount of torque on the grip end while securing the head of the club, the grip would rotate a specific amount. Now do the same with a 48" or 52" driver and note that there will be even greater rotation down the length of the shaft because there is a greater length of material of the same density and weight to achieve rotation.

              Now think about the powertrain setup on most FWD cars. Because the engine and transmissions are transversely mounted, the flywheel is always closer to one side of the car than the other. The transmission is usually located in between the engine and the firewall. One side of the tranny will house the torque converter which of course connects to the driven/output shaft and the diff. It is because of this asymmetry that manufacturers usually have to utilize one drive shaft that's shorter (usually the driveshaft closest to the torque converter) and one that's considerably longer. Think back to the examply above. The torque end of the shaft is the end connected to the transmission and the fixed end is the tires. The transmission must put torque to the ground in order to get the tires moving. Because is transmits more torque to one side than the other due to the longer shaft ABSORBING more torque than the shorter shafter through torsional rotation/stresses, the shorter end typically spins faster (as it's seeing more torque) causing the car to PULL to that side. THIS IS TORQUE STEER!

              When the tires are spinning you can throw torque steer right out the window because you aren't putting any consistent torque into the pavement. Everything in this particular situation depends regaining adhesion. Now should both tires grab at exactly the same time and should the final drive (FWD differential) be transmitting the exact same amount of torque to both shafts at the same time (highly unlikely if the wheels are spinning) and the car STILL pulls consistently to one side, you're also observing torque steer.

              The phenomenon is however mostly observed when you romp on it from a standing start or hit the gas causing the transmission to downshift rapidly and impart greater immediate engine torque to the driveline.

              Find a really flat, smooth, clean strip of pavement with NO ROAD RUTS/TRAIN TRACKS. Make sure it's plenty wide (empty parking lots are great) and when you're ready put your left foot on the brake, right above the gas and take your hands off the steering wheel. When you pull off the brake pedal romp down on the gas with your right foot. If the car goes straight (assuming you haven't lit up the tires) you have NO TORQUE STEER. If the car pulls to one side or the other then try the whole thing over again to see if it's consistent. If it consistently pulls to one side, you have torque steer. If you're not sure after trying this, find someone with a 1994 or earlier Cavalier Z24 with the 3.1L mill under the hood. You'll DEFINITELY discover torque steer with this POS!!

              My GOD. I think I'm approaching epic post length. MUST STOP... must resist urge to continue typing. Must... not... be as nasty to .... Dave in future.... for typing.... long posts. Have a great night everyone. I'm gone.









              •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

                Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

                VolvoFan wrote:

                > Well usually people want to hear the correct answer when they

                > participate in a forum such as this so I'll have to say, YES. It

                > really DOES matter what I want to call it!!

                Nothing wrong with being precise (I try to at all costs myself) but I just wanted to point out that regardless of what the exact definition of this tech subject was, the fact of the matter still is that the car, under certain random circumstances, behaves in an unexpected fashion which can be cause for alarm for some drivers. I applaud your definition below and understand it fully--I have now been....enlightened! :o)

                > And I'm sure if the rear end let loose when you goosed a Camaro V8

                > with an open diff, THAT would be torque steer too? I mean, it does

                > cause the car to turn (spin) in one direction or the other depending

                > on which tire has more traction. Much the same as has already been

                > described in your FWD experiences.

                To my knowledge, RWD cars don't exhibit torque-steer. This would be oversteer.

                > Probably the fact that Journalists usually don't know their ass from

                > a hole in the ground but that's another story. Most tech will know

                > what it is though.

                No comment on the car journalist bit--I'm sure they TRY to understand as much as they can for their job (and an awesome job at that, I might add)

                So would torque-steer be reduced or even eliminated if powerful FWD cars had limited slip diffs instead of open diffs?









                •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

                  Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

                  derspi wrote:

                  > So would torque-steer be reduced or even eliminated if powerful FWD

                  > cars had limited slip diffs instead of open diffs?

                  Somewhat but not necessarily. An LSD will simply transmit power to the wheel with traction. If only one wheel has good traction it'll be that one seeing ALL the torque. Not necessarily a GOOD thing if you know what I mean. LSDs, while eliminating pesky wheelspin don't always necessarily eliminate torque steer.









        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 93

          The "problem" with Torque Steer in our beloved 850 Volvo's are very small compared to other FWD models -

          I had the VW Golf top model (forgot the Letters) as a work car in Europe - and I was very careful with flooring it - as it would go all over the road at speeds over 60 - and if you vere next to someone on the road and changed gears one down to accelerate - you would make a right lane shift. That car was dangerous to make fast overtaking with - my Volvo is a dream. I can drive it with my knee... I remember some of the Saab's vere pretty live too...

          But of course - I had to get used to a "live" steering after years with RWD cars.

          Maybe the AWD's will have a feature with more torque transferred to the rear wheels when steering is activated - although I can see a few new problems arising here.

          Watching the American RWD cars sliding the rear end all over the road in these first wet days in Chicago - and enjoying the no-slip katapult leaving the tollgates while other cars spins their wheels getting nowhere - this Volvo made me praise FWD now.....

          btw - does anyone have experience with noisy Cooper Cobra 195/60 tires -

          I'm getting the noisy treatment with those on the rear axle - sounds like they are with spikes..








        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          fighting" with my steering wheel which wants to go left and right till the tires get a good grip 850 95

          isn't torque steer.

          It's just tires with varying traction.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: Torque Steer? I think not. 850 95

      Or even better, try an Eagle Talon TSi (notorious), or a Pontiac Bonnville or a Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Package (Supercharged)....But, so many people here like to complain about the "torque-steer" of Volvos...it is really laughable when there are cars out there that you need both arms to prevent the car from leaving the road...Anyway ...

      Yannis








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

        Weellll... 850 95

        ...I do admit that in a straight line our V70 performs very agreeably with no discernable torque steer, but if I accelerate hard around a corner I have to hold on for dear life.

        Chalk up another advantage for RWD...oh damn (slap myself) that was another thread...and I got jumped on by VolvoFan already in that regard!

        Seriously, equal length driveshafts go a long way in eliminating torque steer, and Volvos are not too bad in this regard, but face it, 200+ hp is hard to manage for a pure front-driver.

        Caveat: No, I have not driven the S60.









        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Re: Weellll... 850 95

          > if I accelerate hard around a

          > corner I have to hold on for dear life.

          That's not torque steer.

          Mine goes exactly where I point it unless/until a tire spins, at which

          point it has zero traction. If I could not feel loss-of-traction through

          the steering wheel, I'd complain.

          > Chalk up another advantage for RWD

          Yes, quite an advantage to go off the road ass-first instead of head-first.

          - Dave; '95 854T, 103K mi











  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

    Re: S60 Test drives 850 95

    Not to "sound" smart, but if you have a hard time fitting nicely in a V70 you are going to REALLY have a hard time fitting in an A6 or (even worse) a Passat.

    Yannis








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Re: S60 Test drives 850 95

      The worst I've seen are Saab's. I have a '97 9000 CSE 50th addition with the 2.4 Turbo and when every you step on the gas that thing is all over the place. They corrected that the following year with the 9-5.







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.