>> EDIT - See what happens when you start a post, go away for a few minutes (which turns into an hour or so), then come back and finish? Looks like Blue Horse and I agree on tire stuff... they're pretty much identical posts. :) <<
The 165R15 Michelin, labeled in the more modern convention, would be a 165/80R15. That middle number (in this case the "80") is the aspect ratio... sidewall height divided by cross section width. In other words, the sidewall height is .80 of 165 mm. The cross section being 165 mm therefore makes the sidewall height 132 mm. To calculate the nominal tire diameter in inches, convert the 132 mm to 5.2 inches, double it to 10.4 inches, and add the rim diameter (15 inches) for a overall diameter of 25.4 inches. Installed rolling radius will be something less than half that, due to tire flex when loaded.
Anyway... the 165R15's, while slightly wider in cross section, are virtually identical to the original 5.90-15 diameter of about 25.4". Incidentally, my source for the diameter of a 5.90-15 is the Coker Tire online catalog. They also list 3 different brands of 165R15's (Michelin, BFG and Coker), all at 25.3 to 25.4 inches in diameter.
The 165/75R15 and 175/70R15 tires would be quite a bit shorter than the 5.90, at apprx 24.8" and 24.7" diameter, respectively. The 175 would obviously be significantly wider, as well.
Gary L
--
1971 142E ITB racer, 1973 1800ES, 2002 S60 T5
|