Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2007 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

Hi Folks -

I'm in the process of rebuilding my first volvo engine and am looking for some help with a bearing issue. It's a 240 engine: 1989, B230F.

I have gotten the engine back from the machine shop - it was cleaned and honed. It was not re-bored so I am using the same pistons and have replacement rings and bearing sets - all standard (no oversizes). The engine is currently on a engine stand.

I've completed the camshaft install - all good. After the new main bearings were installed and bolts are at torque - it spins just fine. I've installed the new rings to the original pistons, installed the new connecting rod bearings, installed the pistons to the block and have dropped the caps in place - all bolts are finger tight only.

Here's the crux: When I finger tighten the caps, I can turn the camshaft (and pistons) with effort, but smoothly. I re-attached the flywheel to get a better grip. But when I start to tighten the connecting rod caps - I am unable to move the camshaft. Once at torque (15ft/lbs) the cam does not budge. According to my Bentley manual, I still need to give it a 1/4 more turn (i've not taken it that far).

I've gotten oil to all the parts that need to move, so I do not believe its simply friction - my gut says its the wrong sized connecting rod bearings but I've double-checked the part number (its the right bearing set).

Is an engine with without compression, but with new rings, main and connecting bearings, supposed to be moved by a mere mortal - and by hand? Am I just not giving it enough umph?

Can I move forward with the rest of the rebuild with this much friction? I am concerned about blowing the whole engine if this is not correct.

Thanks,
Jim








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

    Are you sure you have the rod bearing caps on the right way? If you get them reversed, they will be slightly
    offset and will bind up. I did this on my first engine overhaul (a 1949 Cushman motor scooter, about 1954)
    and wiped out my new rod bearings. Both the rod and the cap should be marked. Make sure the marks are on the same side.
    --
    George Downs, Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

    First of all you need to get your terms straight. You are speaking of the crankshaft, not the camshaft.
    I am hoping you kept the old parts, and if so compare the rod bearings you were supplied to the old ones. It's possible you have an undersize set - and it does NOT matter what the box says. It's whether the parts fit or not, and there can be no issues with the rotating assembly at all. It is a simple problem of the replacement bearings, nothing more, as long as the rod big ends were not resized, or the crankshaft re-ground.
    I would also warn you that ringing these is engines is difficult. The piston to cylinder wall clearances and allowable tolerances are VERY tight, compared to the B21-23 engines, and if more than about .003 inch is present, the pistons will slap when cold.
    When all is well the engine should turn smoothly with about 10-20 foot pounds of torque, and be slightly stiffer to turn as the pistons reach TDC and easiest when half-way through the stroke. This variation is normal, but no "binding" should be felt at all.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

      thanks for the info - turns out I simply had the connecting rod caps on backwards.
      all fixed and turning great!

      j.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

    I am assuming that when you say cam shaft, you mean crank shaft, the one the connecting rods hook to. If this is correct, you need to plasti-gauge the con rod bearings to the the crank to ensure proper clearance. You must validate the con (connecting) rod bearing to crank clearance, if they are too tight they will burn up if the starter can even turn it over.

    If the plasti-gauge shows that the clearance is too tight, you have two options, the first is to get the proper sized bearings. If that is not possible that means you have an odd-ball sized crank (rare) and need to go with option 2 which means having the crank turned.

    If the plasti-gauge shows proper clearance with the caps fully torqued, keep on building! One more note on the crank, check the thrust bearing clearances, if they are too loose, the crank can move front to back in the block and cause the connecting rod bearings to bind up.

    jorrell
    --
    92 245 250K miles, IPD'd to the hilt, 06 XC70, 00 Eclipse custom Turbo setup...currently taking names and kicking reputations!








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

    Did you have any crank work done?
    Do you have good measuring devices at hand?
    You could see how it turns with the old bearings in place if all were kept in order and no slag or debris are present.
    There is no room for error when it comes to internal engine work,although if you can't make it work you might try some well oiled pigs ears instead of bearing shells.
    peace








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

      Wow,

      Someone else that knows about pig ears for con rod bearings... the old "how do you convert a Jeep motor into a water pump for field irrigation!" Of course, the rawhide straps for piston rings is a really good upgrade as well!

      jorrell


      --
      92 245 250K miles, IPD'd to the hilt, 06 XC70, 00 Eclipse custom Turbo setup...currently taking names and kicking reputations!








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        engine rebuild - 240 connecting rod bearings 200 1989

        yeah I learned about the pigs ears while rebuilding turbo chargers for Mitsubishi they also work well in ford mod-T.
        peace







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.