|
So following on the other thread, I wanted to start a new one detailing the removal and installation of the rear wheel bearing on my '92 245. If you saw the other thread, you'll recall that the axle housing had some nasty corrosion inside, so I will also show I dealt with that little surprise.
First, here are the SKF rear wheel bearing kits I purchased - Made in Japan:


The bearing was pre-packed with unknown grease, so I ended up using a bearing packer (never packing bearings by hand again!) to replace the factory grease with Mobil 1 synthetic as you are required to also pack the inner and outer seals. I wanted to ensure compatibility.
Here's the outer seal packed:

But before I could install anything, I had to remove the old worn bearing and retaining ring. It was suggested I just take the axle housing to a machinist to have the bearings pressed on and off. I recently picked up a big old shop press from a local Volvo mechanic (good karma here) who was liquidating some of his old tools. Glad I did as it came in handy for this job. If you have a press, or can get one, this is an easy DIY job, and no need for a machinist. Just go slow and steady.
Here's the press:

It also came with a bunch of fittings and collars that are required to do this job correctly:


But before we get into that, I decided to use an angle grinder to cut a groove in the retainer ring in order to break it off with a hammer and chisel. I've read here and elsewhere online that this is the right procedure:




Because my old bearing had worn so bad, such that the outer race could slide on and off with ease, on this one I just went ahead and used the angle grinder to cut off the loose and rattling cage as well:

That left just the inner race to press off:

Here I have positioned the axle housing in the press with the collar pressing against the inner sleeve leveraged against a couple arbor plates that also came with the press. You'll note that there is a smooth surfaced steel weight between the end of the axle shaft and top of the press (which is rough and gouged) so as to prevent any damage to the spline end:


A few pumps later and the inner race is nearly off. Smooth like butter:

Time for one of these:

Then it's time to reverse the procedure and press on the new bearings. The green book indicates that the bearing and spacer ring are to be pressed on together - at least using the OEM Special Tool vise press. There is also an adapter to be used. I went ahead and did the same without any issue, though again, I used a different Volvo special tool as a spacer between the press and flange end of the axle shaft:

A few pumps later and the finished product:

With this type of press, it is very easy and straight forward. You quickly get used to the feel of the initial resistance and then the smooth transition as the bearing and retaining ring set onto the shaft. Again just go slow and steady making sure everything is aligned correctly and seating properly. It's also important to remember that the lock plate goes on the axle shaft first, followed by the outer seal, then the bearing and finally the retainer ring. Make sure the lock plate and outer seal are facing the correct direction. The lock plate will likely have more corrosion evident on the outer (wheel facing side) and the cavity side of the outer seal (that you just filled with grease) will face toward the differential. Also note that the tapered end of the bearing faced the differential as well.
So with that done it was on to deal with this:

Not having many options here, I jury-rigged an axle housing tool to remove the rust scale. I used to do a bit of wood working, and happened to have a concave bladed wood scraper called a ProPrep. I don't think they're made any more. Anyway, I took a long piece of fuel line pipe and taped it to the end of that in order to reach deep into the axle housing. On the other end I taped a small diameter disc (actually another Volvo Special Tool) to clean out the rust scrapings that fell as I scraped. I didn't want to be scraping anywhere but the rusted section:



Crude, but effective:


Using this technological breakthrough, I was able to clean out virtually all of the oily scale:

After scraping/clearing all of the rust that I could, I jacked up the opposite side of the axle and carefully sprayed in some carb cleaner to help clean out the residue. Then wiped that out. After that, I used the same tool with a new/clean cotton T-shirt on it, to apply a little POR-15 metal ready to VERY carefully apply this rust converter to the remaining surface rust. After letting that set for a bit I used the same process to clean the converter with water, and after careful drying, to then apply a light coating of gear oil, in the perhaps vain hope that this problem area will stabilize. Here's a few shots of the process:



Once the axle housing was thoroughly "rehabilitated" and cleaned again, I proceeded to press the inner seal into place. Again, the green book calls for Special Tools. As above, I have a small collection of some of these Volvo special tools, and although none of them are correct for this specific job, they happen to be quite versatile, and I was able to piece together a little drift unit that pressed the seal into place nicely with a few gentle taps of the mallet. It's a very tight fit, so some form of home brew drift is required:




Once the seal was seated, then it was simply a matter of sliding the axle shaft into the housing with a few wiggles to get the spline end to seat. Once I found the sweet spot, it slid in very easily - almost too easily - which concerns me that the old failed bearing may have caused some material loss to the housing. Time will tell I suppose, and I will have to keep an eye on it for oil seepage. There did not seem to be anything more than the slightest play, but I won't know for sure until it sees the road.


And that's that. Now on to the other side!
|
|
-
|
My daughter's 1993 940 is leaking oil out of the right rear wheel bearing. I saw this person's excellent write-up on replacing the bearing and seals on his 200.
https://www.brickboard.com/RWD/new_post_form_75b41789-817e-4028-a209-9b738b08282a.htm?id=1614647#REPLY
I found a kit at IPD for the 940s. It is part number SKF 103082. Is the procedure about the same for a 940 as a 200 series?
--
Mine:5-940s running, 2-740, 1-940 parts, dtrs:4-940s
|
|
-
|
Pretty sure it would be identical...Dana 30 is a Dana 30.
I have never had one leak so would not know. first hand.
|
|
-
|
Hi 83GLT,
I add to the chorus of kudos. Yours is an excellent work. Indeed, as maplebones points out, I also hope more folks treat all wheel bearings on there Volvo, so they can continue to be all rollin'.
You are very well tooled up for these tasks.
Like Art points out, your use of flash and depth of field highlighting the axle tube rust is quality imaging as you showed in your prior post kicking off your rear axle rehab.
https://www.brickboard.com/RWD/index.htm?id=1613902&show_all=1
Funny, though. I thought I was alone in being so concerned about the rear axle hub bearings. I'm your only respondent in your your prior thread here I now notice. Sorry.
Through the lens focus with a single flash on-center allows you to record such images. If the flash is off-center, like above or to one side of the lens, you can open the aperture and try different flash levels. Else, an additional flash or two, using appropriate diffusion at the strobe source, and bounce method, with the flashes connected to a flash slave can work to capture such images.
I believe there exist kits that secure to the lens like a lens hood, yet has one or more strobes, or a single strobe shaped in a concentric ring around the lens, yet the hood prevents the strobe light from directly encountering the objective lens.
Like I said before, I forgot the original OEM axle bearing brand as Timken. Maybe these were used as your 240 was built in Halifax and Timken is made in North America somewheres like Rene says?
Would you have recorded the manufacturer name of the light blue axle seals. I've forgot these also. Though what's made today is probably much better. And you have the press to install the seals straight.
As Rene points out, we now have a choice between flat roller bearings or tapered bearings. If we have a choice whether tapered or (not tapered) roller bearings, which is better and why?
Anyone have a garage so I can diagnose (all six) rear wheel bearings in the event of the worst case repair scenario? (ha.) Not having a garage makes this hobby not an easy one.
83GLT, thank you again for treating this wear-item issue. If we at least inspected the rear hub assembly at like the first 50k-100k, maybe, and probably have nothing more to do than a grease repack. Treating it earlier than later is better, I guess.
Thank you,
"I also have a 1992 240. It's a GL. I'm certain it'd love some rear wheel bearing service, huh?"
|
|
-
|
Thank you for your compliments. I'm happy to try to provide helpful information where I can. Most of the time I'm coming here to ask questions, often ones with simple answers. So I'll do my best to give back where I can.
It seems like your knowledge of photography is well beyond my comprehension!
I'm curious to know the difference between tapered/non-tapered bearings as well.
As for the seals, the inner seal was "Made in USA" marked "CR", and the outer seal was also "CR" but "Made in Mexico". SKF bought Chicago Rawhide - a US seal manufacturer - several years ago. So it appears the SKF kits come with CR/Chicago Rawhide branded/made - SKF owned - seals!
|
|
-
|
Hi.
Nice job. This may inspire others to maintain their final drives that have been long neglected. There seems to be a perception that these brutes will last forever without clean oil and grease, and you've illustrated how they won't.
A couple of comments that may be of interest to you or others following in your footsteps.
I know the chisel and grinder removal procedure is quick and practical, but use extreme caution not to leave any marks on that expensive forged shaft. The photo of the chisel poised over the dangerously close grinding sends shivers up my spine.
A notch, even a very small one, is enough to cause a catastrophic fatigue failure on any rotating component subject to reversals of stress. The notch is compressed and tensed every revolution. Fatigue means snap! no warning, and almost surely the loss of a wheel.
The outer race of the bearing is supposed to be an interference fit in the axel housing. It's not unusual to be able to remove them by hand but there shouldn't be any play. Not only does the bearing need a solid back up but a spinning race can quickly destroy the axel housing and that usually means a new rear end. Loctite makes a product called 'cylindrical press fit locker' or some name similar that I like to use if there's any question.
Finally, SkF make pretty good bearings but we have an equally good maker here in the US called Timken. If you put ' Timken Set 10 ' into EBay you'll see them there for less than $30. shipped. I'm guessing this would have left $40 or so dollars in your pocket as well as encouraging manufacturing at home. This is not a case of being cheaper because it's inferior. Set 10 is used in so many applications that they make millions of them and there is economy in scale.
Set 10, according to the Timken application guide, fits all P1800, 140, 160, and 240 from 73 to 89. The guide only goes up to 89. I think in 1990 Volvo started using a plain roller instead of the tapered, which is a different number, but I believe it has the same dimensions and is interchangeable with Set 10. Someone else may have more information on that.
I enjoy your photo essays and hope to see more.
Peter
|
|
-
|
Yes the roller bearing setup is interchangable with the tapered bearing.I have a 240 that has one of each because it had a shaft with a slight bend and i took one from an earlier car, put another 150000 km or so on it ,no problems Because i have many parts 240's in the back 40 i have never changed a bearing or seal,i just pick a shaft from a car that has no leakage.
On a side note,for front hub,strangely i can get SKF bearings cheaper than timkens which are manufactured close to Toronto where i go at least once a month.Go figure
--
Rene
|
|
-
|
Hi Peter,
Thanks very much for your comments. I agree that the grinder and chisel method seems somewhat risky. The photo was for demonstration purposes, but it's good you pointed that out in case anyone attempts to mimic what I was depicting. The green book appears to have both bearing and retainer ring pressed off together. I was thinking anyway that I might try that on the other side. Do you know why people would suggest to use the grinder method instead of just pressing them off together? Others mention heat, but some suggest heat can also weaken the shaft. Why not just press them off together?
If you watch this youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQdb5it7eJQ), Eric the Car Guy uses the grinder to not only remove the retainer ring, but also the bearing itself. It appears to me that in the process he nicked the shaft with the grinding wheel or chisel. Would you say that the shaft in this video is at risk of snapping? No mention is made of this being a danger in the video, but a couple people raise it in the comments.
Good to know about the Timken bearing sets. The original bearings - or at least the old ones were Timken. The SKF sets I got off feEpay were pretty cheap actually. But I'll take a look at the Timkens when I get to this job on the other cars.
Incidentally I removed the other shaft tonight, and the corrosion inside is just as bad. Interestingly the bearings/seals seem to have held up better in spite of this.
Well, thanks again for your feedback.
|
|
-
|
83GLT asked -- " Do you know why people would suggest to use the grinder method instead of just pressing them off together? Others mention heat, but some suggest heat can also weaken the shaft. Why not just press them off together?"
While the bearing and retaining ring are both pressed on it's been my experience that the ring is tougher to remove--seems to be an even tighter fit than the bearing (to me that makes sense). It's only necessary to grind a shallow groove in the ring--and then it needs to be placed on an anvil with the ring solidly on the anvil surface. One whack with a chisel placed in the groove should be enough to split it. I've had to split a bearing race only a few times--it usually will slide off with just the press. -- Dave
|
|
-
-
|
Hi Art,
Well, that is certainly high praise coming from the likes of you. I modeled my documentation on your fine work here, so at a minimum it's an homage!
For the photos I'm using an older Canon Elph digital camera. One of the small ones. I select the "Macro" function which allows for clearer close-ups, but make sure the camera is zoomed OUT all the way. Using a flash and experimenting with different angles achieved the result. The camera is also held right at the housing opening.
I was very lucky to pick up the press. It's USA made, very sturdy and it only cost me $75. Though I had to rent a van for a couple hours to haul it home, but I bundled the press with a bunch of parts and an old Blue Point R-12 charging station to make that expense worthwhile. Incidentally, Harbor Freight offers a relatively inexpensive press that I think could handle this job. Craigslist is also a good option. You never know what tools are going to pop up there. I've easily acquired 3/4s of my shop tools - including the Volvo ones - off CL for a small investment. Good tools pay for themselves in short order.
So I think on the other side I'm just going to press off the bearing with the retaining ring. I'm concerned now about the shaft I just completed. As I looked back through the photos I noticed something alarming - that I may have in fact nicked the shaft with the grinder. I didn't notice it at the time, but is this cause for concern?

I definitely didn't see it as a "notch", more of a scuff or a "skin", but if this has the potential to destroy the axle and make the car a ticking time bomb, I'm more than happy and prepared to start over.
I should also include a picture of the drained differential fluid. There was definitely water in there. I can't imagine how it might have flooded. I bought it in 2005 so had it been in water it would had to have been prior to then. I haven't changed the differential fluid until now. But it did see a lot of winter driving. I wonder if it's just snow and ice melt seeping into the differential over time through the worn seals/axle vent or even a bad differential gasket?
|
|
|
|
|