Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2005 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

Howdy, hope to find everyone doing well.

I have a new to me 1980 240.
The rear bumper rubber seems to have gunk under some of its lip. In those areas with this buildup underneath, it causes the edge (lip) to not lay flat. First thing odd is that gunk was able to get under that lip. The rubber seems to run on and be held on by metal rails?
Are the rubber sections removable?
Do they slide on & off?
Should I wait until summer when the rubber is more pliable? Is it possible to just clean gunk out of an area and the lip will squeeze back into its original location?

Thanks in advance.

Joseph in snowy & freezing New Mexico.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

    Can't help with any of my own experience, but can pass on a link to a current TB thread: http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=346573


    --
    Art Benstein near Baltimore

    Two peanuts walk into a bar, and one was a salted.








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

      Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

      Remove 4 nuts each side to remove bumper. Then screws on the backside hold the rubber trim on.
      --
      82 242-6.2L; '17 Mazda3; '16 Crosstrek








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

        Do as Michael Y suggests - but be prepared with and electric screw gun - you'll need a #2 philips head bit. -- Dave








        •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

          Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

          Actually, I had to use an impact driver. And I got carried away -- the rubber never went back on.








          •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

            Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

            Michael ~ but there is rubber on there?








            •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

              Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

              ??? No rubber. In fact, no OEM bumper. I laid fiberglass up inside the aluminum....
              --
              82 242-6.2L; '17 Mazda3; '16 Crosstrek








              •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

                Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

                "No rubber. In fact, no OEM bumper. I laid fiberglass up inside the aluminum."
                So you removed the rubber, filled in the holes with fiberglass and then painted the bumper black?

                And moved from "snowy & freezing New Mexico" to sunny North Carolina (license plate) all in a day?
                --
                1980 245 Canadian B21A with SU carb, M46 trans, 3:31 dif, in Brampton, Ont.








                •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

                  Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

                  Laid up a completely new bumper using the inside of the Commando as a mold.

                  Never lived in NM. In fact, I've only visited it twice -- both times 20-25 years ago. Been living in NC since '06.








                •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

                  Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

                  I'm pretty sure Michael Y meant he fabricated a bumper by using the inside of the original as a mold. Between the front and rear bumpers your talking about around 60 pounds -- that's 2 percent of the car weight - a nice reduction if your looking for performance (like adding almost 3 HP to the motor). -- Dave








                  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

                    Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

                    I did the math! Hadn't really given it any thought until your comment. Simply calculated how much HP the engine would have to make to keep the Weight/HP ratio the same if I put the heavier bumpers back on. I figured a 50 lb. weight difference.

                    With me in the car - 3200 lbs. w/1/8 tank of fuel. 430HP. 3250 if I add the stock bumpers back. 3250/3200 x 430 = 436.7HP. So looks like 6-7HP.

                    Of course, since the engine doesn't actually make more power, trap speed/top speed largely unaffected. But for acceleration purposes.....we'll round it off to 5HP.








                  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

                    Early 80's rear bumper rubber R & R. 200 1980

                    LOL! Yes, that's what I did. Was looking for a more attractive cosmetic solution to the big Commandos. Because these are laid up inside -- they're a bit smaller than the Commandos. And, of course, I was able to mount them much closer to the body.

                    Yes - useless as bumpers. Obviously, I'm ok with that.







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.