Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2005

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Rescuing a $500 240

5 breakdowns, 58 hours, and 2764 miles in a $500 Volvo 240.

https://www.hagerty.com/articles-videos/articles/2019/07/31/5-breakdowns-58-hours-and-2764-miles-in-a-500-volvo-240?utm_source=SFMC&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Daily_News_Friday_August_2
--
1992 745, >500k km (now gone, but not forgotten)








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Fuel system musings


So I was first thinking this must be an LH 1.0 car because it's an '82 and it has an MAF.

But if that were the case the fuel filter would be under the car, not in the engine compartment as for K-Jet.

So now I'm thinking either this is not the original engine or someone has done a one off conversion of the fuel system. I guess the sticker on the timing belt cover is a clue but I do not know the codes.



--
'80 DL 2 door, '89 DL Wagon, '15 XC70 T6








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Fuel system musings

I'm pretty sure it was indeed an LH1 fuel system originally, especially that it came from California, where LH1 was introduced in 82. Those AMMs (-001) are rare, so only the author has a clue whether it has been adapted to present-day reality over the years, or kept as originally designed. Did he say the filter he changed was under the hood? I missed that.

My squinting at the parts fiche tells me 498960 is a valid engine number for a 1982 B21F, but I see also 961, 962, 963, 964, and 965 listed. But that fuel rail, what I can see of it, does not look like LH1 to me.

Edit: Now I see the filter on the firewall in the AC service picture! Yup, Matt has a compilation car.
--
Art Benstein near Baltimore

“understanding a question is half an answer” -Socrates








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Rescuing a $500 240

Ah -- and a question for the experts. My '82 242DL came with 5 panel tail lights. As those were cracked with age, I've altered the sheet metal and replaced with new 6 panel tail lights. This one had 6 panels -- did it come that way new, or have they been changed out?
--
82 242-6.2L; '17 Mazda3; '16 Crosstrek








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Rescuing a $500 240

I'd wager that the six-panel taillights were a "feature" that was reserved for the GL and Bertone-type models in the early days, but then adopted for even the lowly DL model later because it's cheaper to procure only one version across the (sedan) model.

Have a weekend,
Will








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Tail lights vs trim level and model year

"I'd wager that the six-panel taillights were a "feature" that was reserved for the GL and Bertone-type models in the early days, but then adopted for even the lowly DL model later because it's cheaper to procure only one version across the (sedan) model."

I'd bet alongside of you. It started in '79 with the 6-panel distinction being awarded to those who bought six cylinder sedans. By 84 all trim levels got 6-panel tail lamp assemblies with the flexible circuits.
--
Art Benstein near Baltimore

“The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new.” -Socrates








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Rescuing a $500 240

Just read that earlier this morning. Pretty entertaining.
--
82 242-6.2L; '17 Mazda3; '16 Crosstrek







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.