Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2005 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

responses on B23 vs B230 200 1985

Thanks for the replies. Out of all the info what I took from it is that the B230 has 8 counterweights. I think the reduced friction would be a plus in a motor that's not that efficient to begin with, and the cast vs. forged is not that important. In the 5 Volvos that I had none of them ever needed a crank or main bearing work. The bodies which last a long time were survived by the respective cranks and even cams. I did spend $900 once to get the top end of a B27 redone which included the cams and chains (stupid).

Our 1985 has 180,000 and we got it from a relative for $300. It's a beater and a "3rd" car, but amazingly has no leaks. We avoid driving it if possible to keep the mileage off but not so much that it sits too long. It drives quite nicely but has all the expected quirks like tailamps going out, signal lamps, heater control valve, a/c no longer works, etc.

It's amazing how far technology has come. You can now buy a little 2-liter car for just over ten grand that gets over 35 mpg, lasts a couple hundred thousand miles, and has almost 150 hp and is ULEV. Unheard of back in the 80's huh? We were happy with 114 hp then and 17 mpg.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New responses on B23 vs B230 [200][1985]
posted by  someone claiming to be Peter  on Sun Apr 22 05:26 CST 2001 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.