Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 9/2004 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Eliminating Steering Wheel Shimmy In Volvos, Hope this helps others 700

Eliminating Steering Wheel Shimmy In Volvos

I have owned a 1992 745t for three years and during more than half that time I have been annoyed by an intermittent steering wheel shimmy. At times, the wheel would shimmy at low speeds. Other times it would shimmy at highway speeds. Occasionally, after rotating the tires, it would go away completely for a month or two only to return. Inspection of the tires revealed no unusual wear, so a quick trip to a local tire store to have the tires/wheels balanced was expected to fix the problem. Wrong! Balancing of the tires helped mitigate the severity of the shimmy for a short period of time. However, it never eliminated it completely, and the shimmy steadily returned to its original intensity.

After 24 months of ownership, the tires that were on the car when I bought it finally wore down to the wear indicators. Next, I happily purchased four brand new tires for my beloved Volvo. With other vehicles I have owned, balancing or purchasing new tires solved any and all steering wheel shimmy problems. With this thought in mind, I drove my Volvo out of the tire store and onto the highway with great enthusiasm and expectation. I just about died of heartbreak when the steering wheel started to shimmy almost immediately with even greater intensity. At this point I knew that a more systematic and intensive diagnostic protocol would be needed to identify and exorcise the “Shimmy Demon” from my Volvo.

What follows is a summation of my experience dealing with this annoying problem. During the course of my research, I have found that it is not uncommon for Volvos to suffer from this annoying and often persistent problem. The topic of steering wheel shimmy has appeared numerous times in just about every model series forum on the Brickboard (www.brickboard.com). It is my hope that by sharing what I have learned about this problem, I will help other Volvo owners better maintain and enjoy their Bricks.

Problem Statement: Steering Wheel Vibration or Shimmy

Despite new tires that had been computer balanced, my Volvo with 133,000 miles on the odometer still exhibited an intermittent steering wheel shimmy at highway speeds. The shimmy would start at approximately 55 mph. While driving at this and higher speeds,
the shimmy would appear and disappear. In other words, the steering wheel would be rock steady and smooth one second and shake noticeably the next. Road surface type and condition would have little effect on either the occurrence or amplitude of the shimmy. Frequency of shimmy was consistently proportional to vehicle speed.

Possible Causes

The factors listed below can cause, either by themselves or in association with other factors, steering wheel shimmy.

1. Bent or out-of-round rim.
2. Excessive inconsistencies in tire construction (Radial Force Variation, RFV-more about this later)
3. Improper tire balance
4. Worn suspension parts
5. Worn bearings in wheel hub
6. Improperly adjusted wheel hub
7. Component characteristics (includes improper adjustment of suspension components)
8. Brake component irregularities

Tracking Down the Culprit

Having just bought new tires and double-checking the balance, I pretty much eliminated tire balance as the cause of the shimmy (or so I thought). I turned my attention to the condition of the suspension. Since purchasing the car I have replaced the strut cartridges, lower ball joints, radius arm bushings and added Cherry Turbos upper and lower chassis braces. Both inner and outer tire rod ends checked out to be in excellent shape as well as the steering rack. No discernable play was detected in any of these steering components. In addition, I replaced the front rotors and brake pads shortly after purchasing the car. To further ensure brake components were not the cause of the shimmy, I borrowed a friend’s dial indicator to check rotor run out. After removing some superficial rust between the rotor and hub, run out was reduced to .002 inch, which was well below the Volvo specified maximum of .004 inch. Checking these items and correcting rotor run out did not have any affect on steering wheel shimmy.

I next turned my attention to rim/wheel condition. To isolate a bent or out-of-round rim I rotated the wheels and tires front to back on the driver’s side only and went for a test drive. This did not change how the car drove. Next, I rotated the tires on the passenger side in a similar fashion and went on another test drive. Still there was no change in how the car drove. Based on the results of this test, I concluded that all my wheels were bad or all were good. I opted for good.

I next checked the front hubs. After removing the tire/wheel and caliper I check for any play or looseness in the hub. None was present. Subsequent removal of dust cap and checking of spindle nut with torque wrench further indicated nothing was wrong.

At this point, everything I knew to check appeared to be as it should. The Volvo, in theory, should drive perfectly. Frustrated and running out of options, I called a friend of mine who owns a 1994 944t with the same wheels as mine and asked to borrow his two front wheels and tires. His car drove smoothly without any shimmy. After switching wheels, my car drove like new. No hint of steering shimmy throughout the 10-mile test drive. Upon putting my wheels back on my car the shimmy returned as expected. Using this process of elimination I finally concluded that improper tire balance was the cause of my shimmy problem.



Correcting The Problem

While searching archived posts on related wheel shimmy problems on the Brickboard, I came across a post that described a new tire and wheel balancing machine manufactured by Hunter Engineering Co. The machine is the GSP9700 Wheel Vibration System and it represents an evolutionary leap in tire and wheel balancing technology. The GSP 9700’s outward appearance suggests that it is no different from most tire balancing machines found by the thousands in shops around the county. A closer inspection reveals a difference, however. The difference is a cylinder that contacts the tire as it is spun by the machine. This cylinder is forced against the rotating tire with substantial pressure and is attached to a number of very precise sensors that measure a variety of tire and wheel parameters not detectable by less complex tire machines. Once a tire/wheel has been tested by the GSP9700, a technician can make any number of adjustments to Force Match the rim and tire, dynamically balance it and bring the tire/wheel as close as possible to what could be called total and perfect balance.

Tire Balance

Before delving into the complex workings of the GSP9700 a moment needs to be spent talking about tire and wheel balance. Later model vehicles have become more susceptible to shimmy problems for a number of reasons. These factors include the development and use of more precise steering systems (e.g. rack and pinion), the reduction in weight of steering and suspension components, lower profile tires, higher tire pressures, and increased expectations from car owners. With the advent of these more exact and sensitive vehicles, drivers are now able to feel road imperfections and vibrations to a greater degree. To achieve optimum ride quality greater attention to and accuracy in tire balancing is now required. This fact is even more critical when dealing with a vehicle that, for reasons of design, is more susceptible to wheel and tire vibration.

Tires can be static balanced, dynamically balanced or Forced Matched to help eliminate shimmy problems while driving. Static balance is accomplished by placing the rim/tire on a special balancing stand that has a cross hair and bubble level in the center. Wheel weights are added to the appropriate place along the outside edge of the rim to line the cross hair with the bubble. When this is accomplished, the tire is balanced. The major shortcoming of this method is the fact that the tire is not spinning and therefore the added balancing weights are unable to compensate for any rotational inconsistencies. Years ago when parallel steering systems and “mushy” bias ply tires were the norm, static balancing generally proved adequate.

Dynamic balancing involves placing the rim and tire assembly on a computer balancing machine that spins the tire. As the tire spins, sensors measure and locate the up and down imbalances as well as the side-to-side (wobble) imbalances. The machine then shows where and how much weight needs to be added to balance the tire in both directions. In dynamic balancing, correctional weights are placed on both the inside and outside of the rim to achieve balance whereas with static balancing weights are only placed on one side of the rim and tire. Often, when tires are mounted on expensive alloy rims, self adhesive balancing weights are applied to the inner rim surface, behind the spokes, to maintain pleasing aesthetics. Dynamic balancing is far superior to static balancing and is the most common method used in shops around the country. While the sophistication of these machines has grown and, in capable hands, can be used to balance a rim and tire to a high of accuracy, they cannot detect certain elements that would cause a shimmy in an otherwise “balanced” rim and tire.

When a new car or light truck leaves the assembly line the rims and tires it is riding on have, for the most part, been OE Matched or Force Matched. OE/Force Matching is a balancing procedure that separately identifies the low spot of a rim and matches it with the highest point of Radial Force Variation in the tire. The now matched rim and tire assembly is then placed on a dynamic balancing machine resulting in a more perfectly balanced unit that is less likely to be the source of vibrations on a moving vehicle.

Despite the high degree of precision involved in the manufacturing process, rims are not perfectly round when they come off the assembly line. Before an automotive rim leaves the manufacturing facility it is placed on a machine that measures radial run and locates the section of the rim where circumference is the least. This area is called the “low spot” of the rim. The valve stem hole or a round sticker along the outside edge of the rim often marks the low spot of the rim.

Over at the tire factory, a similar process is undertaken to identify any inconsistencies with the tire’s internal structure. Just like the rim manufacturers, tire manufacturers take great pains to maintain a high degree of consistency with regard to the tire’s internal structure. Despite manufacturer’s efforts some internal inconsistencies exist within a tire. These internal inconsistencies exert an uneven force as the tire spins and are referred to a Radial Force Variation (RFV). Radial Force Variation is detected and measured at the factory using a large, expensive and very precise machine named the Akron Standard Model D-70. The Akron Standard rotates a tire against a spinning drum that is pressed against the tire. The precision sensors attached to the drum measure the forces pushing against it by the moving tire. The D-70 locates and measures the location of the greatest RFV or “high spot” of the tire. The manufacturer then marks the location of the greatest RFV with a round sticker or similar method on the sidewall of the tire. When the tires are mounted on the rims at the assembly plant, the low spot on the rim is then matched with the high spot on the tire by aligning the reference marks. The now OE/Force Matched tire will greatly increase the ride quality of the new vehicle.

I did not find any quantified information regarding the maximum allowable amount of RFV in a given tire. It is certain that different tire manufacturers have different figures for their tires. In addition, lighter, high performance tires must be manufactured to closer RFV tolerances to ensure acceptable performance. For example, a RFV of 10 lbs will be more noticeable in a 255/45 17 tire on a Chevrolet Corvette compared to the same amount of RFV in a 10.5” X 20” tire on a Kenworth T2000. However, a post on the Brickboard mentioned that one tire shop liked to see no more that 6 lbs. of RFV in tires that they mounted.
The GSP97000: Balancing Taken To The Next and Highest Level

The GSP9700 takes dynamic balancing to a new level by testing aspects of the tire and wheel that up until now could only be identified by ultra high dollar equipment. This machine is able to measure all aspects of rim and wheel dynamics so corrective measures can be made. The GSP9700 can identify and/or measure the following wheel and tire related items:

Ø Run out of Rim, Tire and Rim and Tire as an assembly
Ø Force Variation of Tire
Ø Wheel Imbalance (side to side and up and down)

If the rims and tires on a vehicle have been Force Matched and the car still demonstrates a shimmy, it is now possible to eliminate the rims and tires as a source of the problem. Attention can then be focused on other possible causes. However, it has been my experience that the vast majority of wheel vibration/shimmy problems are caused by the something out of whack with either the tire or rim and can be identified by using the GSP9700.

The Cure

Using the locater feature on the GSP9700 website, I located a nearby tire shop that has this sophisticated machine. I paid $60.00 to have all four tires matched and balanced. The subsequent improvement in the ride quality of my Volvo was phenomenal. The car drove incredibly smooth and steady. Needless to say I was very, very pleased.

Having tires analyzed on the GSP9700 usually costs more than having tires balanced on a more traditional machine. However, after having been plagued by stubborn and frustrating steering wheel shimmy problems for some time, it will in all probability seem like a small amount of money to restore the smooth, solid ride your Brick had when it was new.

What All This Means to a Volvo Owner

Based upon what I have learned, I can say with a fair degree of confidence that 700/900 series Volvos are more susceptible to wheel vibration or shimmy than other cars. It is also my belief that front wheel drive Volvos are also prone to wheel shimmy felt through the steering wheel. Information that I have seen indicates other vehicles are also prone to wheel shimmy. Some 3-series BMWs, Mazda Miatas, and earlier model Ford Explorers are three examples. The good news is wheel shimmy is not too uncommon and can be identified and fixed with a little investigative diligence on the part of the car owner. The first step in correcting a wheel shimmy problem is having the tires balanced to a high degree of accuracy by a competent shop. For Volvos plagued with a chronic wheel shimmy problem, I strongly recommend finding a shop with a Hunter GSP9700 and have them run a full diagnostic and Force Match all four tires and rims. This procedure should substantially mollify or completely alleviate any wheel shimmy. Lastly, be sure to maintain proper air pressure, rotate tires on a 6,000 to 12,000 mile schedule, and keep front end components in peak condition.

I hope this helps and drive safely.

Vocabulary

Radial Force Variation: The outward force a spinning tire exerts because of inconsistencies with the tire’s internal construction.

OE/Force Matching: Balancing procedure that separately identifies the low spot of a rim and matches it with the location of highest measure of Radial Force Variation (RFV) in the tire.

References and Further Reading

Hunter Engineering Co’s GSP9700 website: www.gsp9700.com/pub/technical/

Coats Tire Machine website: www.nytechsupply.com/coats/coats_main.htm

Match Mounting of Yokohama tires: www.yokohamatire.com/04a5a.html








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Nice post. Thank You.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Mark, was any recommendation made to switch tires and wheels? It's my understanding that the GSP9700 can also be used to match the the "severity" of an out-of-balance condition between wheels and tires. In other words, the most out-of-balance tire can be forced matched against the most out-of-balance wheel to result in a combination that results in the best overall balance prior to the addition of wheel weights.

Were you pretty confident in the technician's ability to operate the 9700? I've had a previous set of inexpensive tires balanced on a 9700, at a shop belonging to a nationwide chain of tire stores, with less than wonderful results. I still have the nagging suspician that the technician really wasn't aware of information that can be obtained using the 9700.

Thanks for the great information!!



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Ted:

Thanks for your response.

No recommendation was made to switch tires to obtain a better match.

I always harbor a slight distrust of a technician's ability unless time and a developed relationship dictate otherwise. However, the results did speak for themselves. I had the work done at a Discount Tire Store in Rockwall, TX and had to specifically request that the GSP9700 be used and that I expected nothing less than perfection with regard to balance. But we both know that a car owner's definition of perfection is often completely different from that of a so called professional.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Thanks, Mark for the tip. I took my 940 over to the local Ford dealer, who just acquired one of these machines, to remove a high-speed shimmy in my front snows which was not amenable to normal corrective balancing. $25 later the problem is gone. This works!



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Thanks for doing all that work. I really appreciate it.

Rene Svastal
--
1988 745 GLE B23FT M46 (J-P Type combo). Toronto. 390000Km. Suspension upgraded and lowered . 1982 242 GLT project (B23ET LPT to be included) Also in charge of GF's 1986 244



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Great post. Thanks for the time spent and information provided. This one's going to the printer.

Regards,
--
Erwin in Memphis, '88 745t 183,000 miles, '95 855t For Sale



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Many thanks: I will edit this for the FAQ.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

That is extremely valuable information, and well researched. Thank you.
--
chris herbst, near chicago



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

You sure did a lot of work to solve your problem! How many miles do you have on the "Hunterized" assemblies? What brand/model of tire have you been working on?

Your saga is one of the reasons I'm a Michelin fan. When I got my 960 it had horrible tires on it. I got new alloy 16" rims and mounted 205/55-16 Michelin MXV4 Plus XSE on them. A dynamic balance required less that 1 oz at each rim edge on every tire. (One only too .25 oz on an inner edge.) They have been smooth at any speed as they have worn down almost to the wear indicator at this point. I switch front to back every season when I alternate with the snows. (Michelin Pilot Alpins.) In my experience Michelin typically builds a very uniform tire that stays "balanced" through its life. (I had your problem with my wife's BMW with "Krapelis" and finaly threw them out with half the tread left on them)

It will be interesting to see if your "Hunterized" assemblies stay smooth as they wear. I assume your strut rod bushings were replaced during your saga? They are a short lived component on the 700/940 cars and bad ones will make the front end unstable!
--
'96 965 with 16' wheels at 101K. Had '85 745 Turbo Diesel for 200K.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

When I purchased the car it had Eagle HP's. These easily qualify as one of the worst tires on the market. Tire size is 205 55\16 on Hydra rims. I replaced the Eagle's with Continental Touring Contacts. I picked these because they had the highest wear rating for the money. Since having the wheel\tires balanced, I have been extremely pleased with the tires. They are quiet, smooth and have shown little or no wear. True, Michelins are better tires, but at the time I could not justify spending the additional money. In retrospect, I would probably spend the extra money. The tires currently have approximately 14,000 miles on them.

One of the reasons the steering wheel still shook after the new tires were installed is that balance weights were only placed on the inside of the rims. This was done per my instructions. I did not want any balance weights visible on the outside of the wheels\tires. After doing a little research, I realized it more important for the wheels\tires to be properly balanced than a balance weight show on the outside of the wheels.

Yes, I did replace the strut rod bushings shortly after purchasing the car with the IPD poly units.

Thanks for your response.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

I thank you for your response!

I'm a little leary of tires that have an extra long wear index. It usually means the rubber is so hard that traction is sacrificed. When I got my 745 years ago it had "Kelly" tires on it with many miles but with lots of tread still left on them. They were like driving on ice when it rained and not much better when dry. I sold the lot for $30 to a fellow who wanted "cheap" tires and put Michelins on my car. I also warned him about the tires relative low traction but he didn't seem to care.

I typically get 50 to 60K miles on the Michelins with a wear index around 380. I look at good tires as being equivalent to inexpensive life insurance. I buy them on-line by Model and size at the lowest priced vendor. (Usually not TireRack)

Happy "Rolling"

--
'96 965 with 16' wheels at 101K. Had '85 745 Turbo Diesel for 200K.



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.





  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    EDIT   PRINT   SAVE 

Thanks for the great post. I recommend that it be given a Red Star.

Bill



Mark this post as an answer to my question<- Use this feature to mark quality replies to your post.




<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.