Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2004

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

84 2.3 N/A vs. 87 2.3 Turbo Compression Ratio Q

posted by  Enginerd on  Fri Feb 27 18:28 CST 2009
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Thu Mar 26 12:47 CST 2009
[RELATED]

Hi all, just joined to get this simple question answered...please answer if you can, or point me in the right direction...THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE!

*I am rebuilding an engine for a friends 84 240 DL sedan with the N/A 2.3L motor...and can get him a free head from a 1987 (same make/model) TURBO 2.3L...

And I'm wondering if anyone can tell me the factory compression ratios for these two motors:

- 1984 240 DL sedan with the N/A (naturally aspirated) 2.3L
- 1987 240 DL sedan with the TURBO 2.3L

I plan on re-using the cam from the N/A motor on the turbo head...and am wondering if the ratios are close enough to get away with this swicth.

Thanks again for reading!






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 84 2.3 N/A vs. 87 2.3 Turbo Compression Ratio Q
posted by  Enginerd  on Fri Feb 27 18:28 CST 2009 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.