Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: I like Bernard's answer better than my own!! 200 1978

I'm sorry but I feel a need to disagree on a couple points. I cannot

feel much difference in my 242GT being noseheavy since doing the Converse

conversion. My car does have Konis & IPD springs. At very high (racing) speeds it will understeer more, or push if you will, going into corners. Also I feel my car is much more valuable to a larger audience

than before. Only a select few want to drive an anemic underpowered

car on a daily basis. The swap has made the car a ball to drive & has

gained respect with several vintage racing types that got eaten up alive

at a race weekend this summer. It's so nice to beat someone who's car has

cost 25 to 30 thou. more than yours. In closing, I'd recommend taking

a look at the CONVERSEENGINEERING webpage and read the car & driver reprint (April'97). The gent who did the swap on my car before I bought

it had the same kind of misgivings regarding butchering a 1st year GT.

But he was very glad he did & so am I.







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.