Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2011 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

240 Battery Size, 1988 vs 1984 200 1988

Hello All -

The 1988 244GL that wife.sig uses has a battery that is (1) not as long as the older types (2) is held down by clamp things on the "feet" on each side and the fender end, (3) has fewer cold cranking amps that the older types.

The battery has gone on strike the last few chilly mornings (it's a DuraLast AutoZone bought in 1998). I haven't checked for any unauthorized current drains yet.

From a non-op 1984 244DL I have a Die Hard battery of the old size. It usually is held in by a "foot" on the fender end and a screw-down clamp against a "foot" on the engine end. It has more CCA than the newer style. I want to swap it into the 1988.

The 1988 battery tray has no hold-down system other than the clamps on the feet - not even a screw hole for that old-style clamp.

SO THE QUESTION TO YOU IS: Have you ever installed the older and longer style in a car that is supposed to use the shorter style? How did you handle the hold-downs?

I shall post this in OPINIONS also.

Thanks in Advance,

Bob

:>)








THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240 Battery Size, 1988 vs 1984 [200][1988]
posted by  B.C. subscriber  on Sat Dec 7 08:30 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.