Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2002 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Thermostat choice...cooler...better...?? 200 1990

Guys,

This is one of those theoretical questions:

I noticed there are a lot of choices for thermostate temp rating.

92' for cold climates, 88' for hotter, but I even saw one rated 86 or something lower (not an OEM installation)

I was thinking, would it be better for the engine to operate at a relatively low temp such as 86'. My logic is lower the temp, less wear on the engine. Less premature combustion (therefore less pinging and knocking)

Because heat softens the metal thus allowing more steel molecules to rub off as the parts turn.







THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Thermostat choice...cooler...better...?? [200][1990]
posted by  Survivor99  on Tue Mar 18 11:30 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.