Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

rear shocks - off-car test (stock hydraulic vs. gas) 200 1986

I'm doing my rear trailing arm bushings, and as I'm pretty certain that the rear shocks are original, I decided that I'd do the rear shocks at the same time. I figured that the originals would provide little resistance when I tried to compress them off of the car, but they seem to have as much resistance as the Sachs Advantage Turbo Gas shocks I bought from Groton. The only difference is that when I compress the Turbo Gas, they gradually return to full extension, whereas the originals stay in whatever position I put them in. Both shocks have about equal resistance to movement in all positions and directions.

I believe the originals are Boge Automatic which are stock hydraulic shocks (no gas). Is this what the difference is between stock hydraulic shocks and gas shocks - that the gas shocks return to full extension, whereas the stock hydraulics don't - or is this an indication that the stock hydraulic shocks are indeed worn?






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New rear shocks - off-car test (stock hydraulic vs. gas) [200][1986]
posted by  darmstrong  on Sun Aug 3 09:04 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.