Volvo RWD 900 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2005 900 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B6304 differences revisited, with graph 900

So I decided to look up all the info again and make another graph to shed a little more light on the subject of pre/post 1995 960 engines. What can I say, it was a slow day at work... :)

It's pretty self explanatory, bottom line is RPM, side line is hp/torque in ft*lbs. Red is the early models, blue is the later ones. All the data points are valid to the best of my knowledge, I just connected the dots. If anybody has more stats, I'll be glad to add them to make a more accurate graph.

I didn't note it, but the lines torward the top of the graph represent torque, and the other pair represent horsepower.

The interesting thing to note is that the later engine has 20 more ft*lbs at 2400 RPM, and while it does drop off sooner, it's not by any signifigant amount until my data runs out at 5200, only about 5 ft*lbs less up there.

So have a look, draw your own conclusions, alter/justify your driving habits, discuss!

Enjoy!







THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New B6304 differences revisited, with graph [900]
posted by  someone claiming to be anonymouse  on Mon Feb 9 12:03 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.