Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2002 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

comparing cams 200 1991

I know this is a recurring subject, but your interest is appreciated...

IPD touts the VX cam as a great way to improve mid-high RPM response in the NA red block engine, with a small loss of low RPM torque, with little to no effect on emissions and fuel consumption.

The VX is popular despite its high (I think excessive) price from IPD, and used VX cams are hard to find (on eBay for example) for less than $100.

A and B cams are easy to find for less than half that price, but they are an older design than the stock M and VX cams. Do they have a similar effect as the VX with respect to torque curve, emissions, and fuel consumption? If so, they would be a much better value for me.

I have a '91 244 (128k miles) which runs perfectly and has the M47 transmission. It has stock engine components and passes smog tests easily. More power would be nice for freeway onramps and staying ahead of tailgating LA drivers. Forget about a really hot camshaft, I need some low end torque for stop and go driving and quiet cruising.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New comparing cams [200][1991]
posted by  doubleblue  on Thu Apr 21 06:49 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.