I traded my '89 240DL sedan last October for a V70 2.4 auto no turbo, premium and cold weather packages. The old manual was fun to drive, but my V70 holds more, gets better mileage, and is a much better drive. So far 10,000 miles (three oil changes) and absolutely zero problems. My old had several teething problems that all got solved once I quit using the dealer service department, the new one has yet to need any service other than fluid changes.

I did it nearly two years ago. A 90 245 for an 01 V70, 5 speed na. There are times when I regret it, but they are few. Love going uphill without rowing, the flat corners, and I'm getting the same or better gas mileage. Two hours north of you.

Congratulations on your new ride. I think I have read that the '99 and '00 model years are a little better than the '98- just like the '96 and '97 850 was better than the '93 and so on. My crystal ball indicates that the five cylinder models will last as long as the four cylinder models but because of a higher level of complexity, will cost more in the process.

In my opinion, the 98-2000 N/A S/V 70 were the most trouble free of the front wheel drive offerings.

HA ! ! ! I did the same , 89 240 for a 98 awd.i feel you worry bro... but in 12000 kilometers, only a door actuator switch for $ 170 cdn compared to the same unit in a 98 concord for $35( or so I was quoted). lets keep our timing belts crossed... These 2 bricks cannot be compared huh? Den

You'rrrre going to regret doing that. Best look another part-time job for the repair bills.

Ask the dealer where the car was serviced for the records.

I am thinking of doing the same thing, but perhaps keep the 240. Do you mind telling me what you paid and what part of the world you're in?