The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: V70 versus V40? V70-XC70 2002

posted by  someone claiming to be Sam on  Sun Dec 16 13:50 CST 2001 [RELATED]

I think it's an unfair comparison as the V70 is a higher end car. The V40 is more comparable to a Suburu or VW wagon.

Unless money is very important, the V70 2.4T with minimal options (about $38,000) is the way to go. The T5 would cost over $40K and unless you plan on taking it over 90mph, you won't notice a difference.

The V70 is also all new for 2001, while the V40 will probably change in a year or two.





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.