The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

No

posted by  someone claiming to be Victor on  Mon Nov 26 12:44 CST 2001 [RELATED]

I'd agree with Consumer Reports, don't buy any AWD Volvo as they've been problematic and I doubt they'll last nearly as long as any 2WD Volvo, at least not without spending a ka-zillion bucks over the next few years. Their AWD system may work OK in snow or wet pavement but the design and overall quality of the AWD systems parts is terrible, far worse than ANY AWD vehicle I've ever seen or read about to date.

On a brighter note, the 2WD (front wheel drive) Volvos have been much better overall.





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.