The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Considering S60 purchase. Information please.

The only similarity it has to the old bricks is the logo. Everything else has changed. It is more costly to repair, has more computers than a household with teenagers, and is safer.
There is much less interior room, especially in the rear seats. And the trunk is a little smaller than a 240.

The light pressure turbo engine is a good compromise, returning reasonable mpg and still running on 89 octane.

If you like RWD, look at the BMW 5xx models for more room but 91 octane and slightly higher maintenance costs :)

The S60 is not being sold this year due to an 'upgrade', but the 2003-5 are good volvos. The bodies do not rust unless panels are replaced with aftermarket. The S80 with NA engines are pretty good also, just stay far away from the T6 or V8.

Klaus
--
Proud owner of a 220S. If I had more room, I would have more Volvos.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.