The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

2001-2 S60 2.5T. Should I, or shouldnt I?

My brother had a toyota, 4 cyl, and never had a problem in 240K miles. Most of them local miles.

You already know that Volvo will cost more to maintain, the parts are more expensive. But Volvos have a great safety record and most comfortable seats.

The light pressure turbo Vs the normally aspirated engines are both durable, if maintained. The turbo gets 1-2 mpg less than the NA engine, but it also has more standard features.

Toyota parts can be had anywhere, they are cheap, and the 4 cyl engine is easy to work on. They get great mileage. And if you are the same height as your average Japanese, the seats are OK. There are millions of Toyotas on the road compared to 100,000 Volvos.

Comparing Volvo to a Japanese car is like apples and oranges.

Klaus
--
Two great Volvos, a 1967 220 and a 1998 V70R






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.