The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Timing belt/replacement engine update 850 1996

> One last question: why aren't all engine "noninterference?" It seems to me that there whould be a really good reason for a car to be designed in a way that will lead to self-destruction if a belt breaks...

Interference engine design comes partly from the multi-valve per-cylinder setup to get better volumetric efficiency (compared to 2-valve per cylinder engines), which requires the valves to be angled into the combusion space and partly design parameters which increase fuel efficiency, reduce emissions and produce more power (eg. higher valve lift).

The advantages outweigh the risks of a belt breaking. It's statistically a pretty rare occurence and usually only in cases like yourself (physical damage) or insufficient maintenance/replacement intervals.

Bye, Arno.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.