The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

ATF FLUSH METHOD: OFFICIAL vs. BAY13 850 1994

I am going to flush ATF and I have a doubt about the method.

BAY 13 method has been very recommended in this forum, it seems very easy. But I see an advantage using the official Volvo method in which the first step is to drain ATF from the bottom of the transmission: sediments would be removed and not with BAY 13 method. It is well known that metal sediments are harmful.
Any idea?

Has anybody experience in both methods?

Another question: How many litres are expected when draining?

Thanks in advance.

--
850 GLT Aut.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.