The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

fuel consumption 850 1995

posted by  someone claiming to be Ray N. on  Wed Jul 2 05:21 CST 2003 [RELATED]

My wife has a 95 855 GLT with the normally aspirated engine and I have
a 98 S70 T5M (turbo). The milage is close if you can resist using the
turbo. Use the turbo a lot and it gets lower milage. So, it really depends
on how you drive. But, the difference is really small enough to ignore
(keeping your tires properly inflated is probably a bigger milage issue as
well as driving habits).

On long highway trips (where the turbo is not used much) the T5
returns about 1MPG less then the normally aspirated GLT. Note that
my T5 has a manual transmission so it may be more like 1.5 MPG
with an automatic transmission.

One of the nice things about small turbo charged engines is you do
get decent milage and have power on tap.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.