Volvo AWD S60 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2019 S60 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Considering a used S60 S60

posted by  Stonebr on  Thu Dec 13 04:04 CST 2007
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Mon Apr 22 14:24 CST 2013
[RELATED]

Basically the newer the better, but don't rule out the 2003. Mine has been solidly reliable. The base model non-turbo feels a bit slow with an automatic, but with a 5-speed manual it feels much quicker, at least to me. I've averaged about 31 mpg over the life of the car (with good driving habits) -- mostly on the highways here in New England.

2003 S60 2.4 5-speed manual
75,000 miles and counting.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Considering a used S60 [S60]
posted by  mlandusk  on Wed Dec 12 08:43 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.