Volvo AWD S60 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2004 S60 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: 2.4T versus the T5 model S60 2001

Brian Lawrence wrote:

> Actually, I got to test drive the T5 with the Geartronic transmission

> yesterday. Great car! Quiet, powerful, and well balanced. Loads of

> torque (and very fast without realizing it!!). But I still found

> turbo lag with both the T5 and 2.4T equipped with the automatic

> transmissions. It causes a bit of an odd hesitation I'm not used to

> in the first few seconds of take off (I'm beginning to sound like I'm

> piloting an aircraft!) It was much more noticeable on the 2.4T.

Say what?????

The setup on the 2.4T is much LESS likely to display turbo lag than the T5. Automatic vs Automatic (2.4T vs T5) it's actually much easier (STC off) to light up the front skins on the 2.4T than it is the T5. Now as for the manual T5.... that's a completely different story all together. Vaporized rubber anyone??






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Anybody gotten an S60 yet? [850][95]
posted by  someone claiming to be Malcolm Moore  on Tue Nov 14 11:08 CST 2000 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.