Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2016 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

B21FT piston to ring side clearence below minimum 200 1984



I'm replacing the rings and the side clearence is below the minimum spec value. Should this be a big concern ?








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B21FT piston to ring side clearence below minimum 200 1984

What is spec and what did you measure?
--
WANTED: #572 ECU from LH3.1 M47 '90-'93 240








  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

B21FT piston to ring side clearence below minimum 200 1984


I measured the " piston ring side clearence Gap" ( the roof and/or the landing of the piston rings inside their piston grooves )don't remember spec's and I'm quite a distance from my shop. In theory spec's shouldn't matter, if it's a problem it should apply to almost any engine. P.S. Thsi is NOT piston end gap I'm speaking about. There shouldn't be anything wrong w/ having below min. spec. ring side clearence gap..... ooohh maybe not adding gap had you confused. My Bad anyways if you ahve any info on this subject it would be nice.

ciao for now ljrh........is the LH 3.1 exclusive to a 240 between 90 and 93 because I have a '85 740 w/ the Jetronic comp. and the M47 still in car and they are going to the crusher. get back to me on them...I'm also in B.C. , Canada







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.