Volvo RWD 900 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 10/2023 900 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

95 Volvo 940T - Faulty Airbag 900 1995

You have my total sympathy. A lot of similarities here. '95 940 wagon. Low speeed accident. Wife driving. Physical scratching and bruising. SRS system deployment (always a full deployment of both air bags and both seat belt pyrotechnic tensioners). Passenger air bag took out the windshield. No bumper damage with the car ahead. Car declared a write off. Unhappy Volvo owner.

Yes, Volvo did extend the air bag inspection interval from 10 years to 15 years. Note that it's an inspection interval, not a replacement interval -who could justify the expense of a full replacement on an older car? Yes, the SRS system can fully deploy in a low speed frontal accident, even a rear-ender, with little or no damage involving the vehicle ahead. It's a matter of inertia and direction, not speed that determines the deployment -rear-ending a car ahead, or being rear-ended or over even T-boned does not necessarily cause a deployment (protection is for frontal and off-frontal impact of a certain magnitude). Yes, the windshield will break. Yes, the car will likely be declared a write off by the insurance company.

1995 940 wagons, and 945T's in particular, were the last of the great Volvo 4-cyl RWD breed and are fairly rare -I've noticed only a few others in my travels. I presume yours was otherwise in fairly good shape. It is a crime in my mind to see one taken off the road just because of an SRS deployment. From your description, I do not consider the air bags faulty in any way. Desirable or otherwise, they behaved as designed with your overall safety in mind. It's a shame the system wasn't the new and improved one ('96 960/V90 on I believe) where the crash sensors were intelligent enough to release a partial deployment when a passenger wasn't present or in the event of a low speed situation. That may have prevented a deployment altogether or at least it might have saved the windshield, not to mention the physical scratches and bruising.

On the bright side, after in-depth discussions with the insurer, I convinced them to change their mind and the car was repaired. The statistics should tell them they're financially better off having policies on Volvo's rather than many other machines where a major accident means major bodily injury claims (their biggest fear). And last but not least, other than being a more nervous driver, my wife has totally recovered.

I'm going to e-mail you off-line about our experience (be patient, it may take a few days). There may be other factors in your story I'm not aware of, but I may be able help you save your beast.
--
Dave -940's, prev 740/240/140/120 Never overestimate what little I know.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 95 Volvo 940T - Faulty Airbag [900][1995]
posted by  johnb102  on Sun Sep 2 07:17 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.