Okay, I own a 1989 240 wagon and a 1993 940 (non-turbo) wagon. The 940 has some features that make is a lot more practical for hauling cargo--the split back seat, superior backseat release levers, and more horizontal space. Tailgate wiring in the 940 is not a chronic problem. The blower motor on a 940 can be replaced in an hour. THe 940 is generally a more modern, smoother riding, more comfortable, and structurally safer (unibody redesigned for 1993 to meet 1997 side impact standards) vehicle. Visibility is about the same in both models: excellent (especially compared to anything new). Your 240's both had the crappy old A/C system--the 940 has the newer CCOT system, which performs adequately.
That said, I have found the 240 generally easier to work on (I have yet to experience heater core or blower motor failure on it, though). Interior parts have about the same level of availability on both models (rarely available from the dealer anymore, crapshoot to find in good condition in the junkyard). The 940 (in the US market) only has power windows, and the mechanisms wear out at the center pivot resulting in poor window sealing (wind noise) when closed. My 240 has crank windows, and a biennial clean/lube seams to keep them happy. The 240's electrical system is a chronic weak point, but I do find it simpler to diagnose than the 940, and anything involving accessing the 940 central electrical panel can be really an ordeal. A 240 can be just as comfrotable as a 940, if you are willing to spend the time and $ to rebuild the seats properly. (There's a guy selling new foam cushions and upgraded seat grids)
The instrument clusters in 940 are prone to bad traces and loose solder joints. I am absolutely not a fan of those Yazaki clusters.
In short: I love my 240, and would drive it anywhere. That's the car I take on road trips (except when it's really hot, and the 940's A/C is a must, or it's snowy/icy and the 940's ABS is a must). THe 940 is just a practical car, the 240 has character.
John
--
1989 245 245K / 1993 945 131K
|