Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2009 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B20E or B20F? 140-160

If you were looking for a 142E, which would be more desirable - a car with the high compression B20E motor or a car with the low compression, "smog certified" B20F mill?

My understanding is that '70 and '71 142's had the high compression, 135 horsepower B20E with D-Jetronic and no catalyst. Best I can remember my old '71 142 had this engine.

The '72-'74 model years came with the B20F, which has a lower compression ratio, a different camshaft, and a D-Jet with a cat converter. Horsepower is down to 118 on this engine, but some have said that it is tuned (cam?) to be more tractable throughout the rev range than the B20E was. Newer 142's also have instrumentation and some interior bits and pieces that were shared with the early 240s.

So, which would you choose?






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New B20E or B20F? [140-160]
posted by  someone claiming to be George  on Sun Jul 15 22:24 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.