Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 10/2004 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Hmmm... coincedence? Vacuum leak 700 1987

posted by  SpazMan on  Sun Jun 8 05:42 CST 2008
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue Aug 14 21:06 CST 2012
[RELATED]

Hi guys and gals,

I was out doing some transmission stuff in the yard to my 740GLE, and I decided to replace my funky (original to the car, maybe?) flame trap hoses with the replacements I got from FCP Groton the other day. As I pulled the flame trap, I found it was funky too (and only 3 months old), and replaced it too. Didn't have time to do the breather box today, but it's on the list for this coming week.

I used a length of FCP's 'braided' vacuum hose as a replacement for the tiny hose off the flame trap. It seems a little loose to me, so... is this the right hose for this application?

Pulling the car back into my driveway, I noticed that I got no boost from my brakes!

So, after the car cools down a bit, I'm going to poke around and try to see where the leak is. Did I use the wrong vacuum hose on the flame trap?

Thanks,

Ari






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Hmmm... coincedence? Vacuum leak [700][1987]
posted by  SpazMan  on Sun Jun 8 05:42 CST 2008 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.