Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Bilstein Touring vs. KYB Gas A-just rear shock preference 200

posted by  geodonuts on  Mon Jun 29 13:31 CST 2009
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue May 27 23:38 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Quick poll: who here would rather use KYB Gas A-just rear shocks instead of Bilstein Touring? Both are quite cheap up here in Portland (36 or 37 for the KYB and 41 for the BT and NO SALES TAX!) and I just want to know what the common consensus for most people around here was. The Bilstein Touring seem to be notorious for their mis-sized bolt hole which rattles on a lot of 240s. If I can avoid that I will; the KYBs don't have too much general criticism, but then again, all it takes is one failure. the four dollar difference is not an issue to me.

just asking, please respond if you have a strong opinion (otherwise i'm just gonna install the BTs because I already bought them).






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Bilstein Touring vs. KYB Gas A-just rear shock preference [200]
posted by  geodonuts  on Mon Jun 29 13:31 CST 2009 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.