The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Bilstein Touring vs. KYB Gas A-just rear shock preference 200

Quick poll: who here would rather use KYB Gas A-just rear shocks instead of Bilstein Touring? Both are quite cheap up here in Portland (36 or 37 for the KYB and 41 for the BT and NO SALES TAX!) and I just want to know what the common consensus for most people around here was. The Bilstein Touring seem to be notorious for their mis-sized bolt hole which rattles on a lot of 240s. If I can avoid that I will; the KYBs don't have too much general criticism, but then again, all it takes is one failure. the four dollar difference is not an issue to me.

just asking, please respond if you have a strong opinion (otherwise i'm just gonna install the BTs because I already bought them).






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.