Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2010 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Is the 1974 B20 block to be avoided? 200 1975

Hi all,

my 1975 B20F engine now has zero compression on cylinder #2 from broken piston-rings.

Of that, I am certain.

I am taking for granted that the cylinder-wall must have been deeply scratched and gouged, by now.

I have not even removed the cylinder-head to check the condition of the dead cylinder as I am too much in a hurry to get the car running again.

Rather than consider fixing and investing in my 1975 B20F, I am starting to look for a good replacement block.

I have located a 1974 Volvo 142 with a B20F with 95,000 miles.

I have read here and there that the 1974 B20 block-casting is 'soft' and porous.

What is the consensus of the B20 Brickboard-experts on the subject?

Should I or not give that 1974 B20 block any consideration as a replacement block?

Thanks in advance for all sensible advice.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Is the 1974 B20 block to be avoided? [200][1975]
posted by  pierre  on Sun Aug 2 17:09 CST 2009 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.