The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Is the 1974 B20 block to be avoided? 200 1975

Hi all,

my 1975 B20F engine now has zero compression on cylinder #2 from broken piston-rings.

Of that, I am certain.

I am taking for granted that the cylinder-wall must have been deeply scratched and gouged, by now.

I have not even removed the cylinder-head to check the condition of the dead cylinder as I am too much in a hurry to get the car running again.

Rather than consider fixing and investing in my 1975 B20F, I am starting to look for a good replacement block.

I have located a 1974 Volvo 142 with a B20F with 95,000 miles.

I have read here and there that the 1974 B20 block-casting is 'soft' and porous.

What is the consensus of the B20 Brickboard-experts on the subject?

Should I or not give that 1974 B20 block any consideration as a replacement block?

Thanks in advance for all sensible advice.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.