Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

stance 200 1989

Ive run 205(x14) on the brick, and 195s (currently). It seems the 205s ride is a touch smoother but the 195s ride fine and seem to last longer. I've been considering, JUST considering, mind you, when time to get new tires once again, to run 205s in the rear and 195s in the front. Why? you ask. Only one "reason", good reason or not: stance!

However, the issues of wear and tear, the ride itself and any contraindications of safety come to mind, all for a different stance? And would I need to carry 2 diff sizes of spares? As far as the stance, I just think a nice looking wagon would look good with a slight frontal rake. Crazy? Of course, that goes without saying, but hey, no law against "crazy, **or is there?? :Þ






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New stance [200][1989]
posted by  anthony2  on Wed May 27 21:20 CST 2015 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.