The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

stance 200 1989

posted by  anthony2 on  Wed May 27 21:20 CST 2015
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue Jul 22 20:01 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Ive run 205(x14) on the brick, and 195s (currently). It seems the 205s ride is a touch smoother but the 195s ride fine and seem to last longer. I've been considering, JUST considering, mind you, when time to get new tires once again, to run 205s in the rear and 195s in the front. Why? you ask. Only one "reason", good reason or not: stance!

However, the issues of wear and tear, the ride itself and any contraindications of safety come to mind, all for a different stance? And would I need to carry 2 diff sizes of spares? As far as the stance, I just think a nice looking wagon would look good with a slight frontal rake. Crazy? Of course, that goes without saying, but hey, no law against "crazy, **or is there?? :Þ






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.