Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2011 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

To Gap, or not to Gap ? 200 1990

While performing minor maintenance on a family member's 1990 240, I discovered that a mechanic had installed a NGK BPR6ES spark plugs, gapped at 0.40-INCH!!! I thought this was too wide, so I checked my manual. Haynes specifies a gap of 0.28 - 0.32-inch for a standard Bosch plug or equivalent. Then, I called a local parts store, and a clerk said the NGK plug gap should be 0.40-inch!

TO GAP, OR NOT TO GAP --- WHAT IS THE CORRECT GAP?
Should I re-gap the plugs to 0.28-inch? Or should I leave them at 0.40-inch?

I checked past Brickboard posts, and most guys recommend 0.30/0.32 as the norm. Why would a mechanic gap them at 0.40-inch? What damage could this have caused to the engine? If I change it to 0.30, what difference will this make on Fuel Economy? How will it affect Performance? I assume it will not correct a rough idle, since all plugs are gapped the same.

When I re-gap to 0.30, is there anything else I should adjust at the same time?

Also, which is better for a warm Southern US climate: NGK BPR6ES or BPR7ES ???

TEST CAR: 1990 240, 117k mi. New fuel filter, air filter, plug wires, flame trap OK, engine oil changed to Mobile-1 10W-30 synthetic fluid.

[[ southern fried volvo ]]






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New To Gap, or not to Gap ? [200][1990]
posted by  someone claiming to be southern fried volvo  on Sun May 12 12:44 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.