Volvo RWD 900 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2010 900 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Too Much Torque Myth??? 900

posted by  someone claiming to be Steve C on  Thu Aug 26 08:21 CST 2004 [RELATED]

In several threads in the past, I've seen the explaination for the lack of a torque converter on Turbo automatics as being to limit torque to the rear wheel. I posted the response below deep in another long thread, but am reposting it here to solicit more comments? Does anyone really know why the torque converters were left out of the turbos?

Steve C

----------------------

I don't buy the "too much torque" explanation that is always mentioned. 195 ft pounds is great for a 4 cyl engine, but overall, is still not a hell of a lot for a 3400 pound car. I also have have an older Ford V-8 rear wheel drive sedan with straight live rear axle and a lot more weight, a lot more torque, no panhard rod, no dual torque rods, and still no problems. What is this fear or feeding torque to the rear wheels . . . isn't that the POINT of having a more powerful engine???

I am wishing my 92 945t was equipped with a lockup torque converter - bet it is worth 2-3 mpg. One thing these cars are not is thrifty on fuel.

Steve C






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Too Much Torque Myth??? [900]
posted by  someone claiming to be Steve C  on Thu Aug 26 08:21 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.