The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Double up on that! 140-160

The Jag 12s in the early '70s Etypes had the same HP and torque ratings as the six cyl. and are way, way, way more complex... ie, the 4 strombergs you mentioned. The 12s just don't hold up as well. Take a look at the bottom end of the Jag I-6 XK engine. Tank like with 7 main bearings, lots of cast iron... Oh...yea. They did use the XK engines in tanks too...

The 12s are, of course, smooth as silk when in proper order...

Drive safe out there George!

--
-Matt I ♥ my ♂






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.