|
240+700 versus 850's?
Altogether different vehicles in so many ways -- to avoid writing a book length article, can you narrow your interest? E.g., ease of maintenance, longevity, handling characteristics, crash safety, etc.
I'll just start on each (and we'll no doubt have some disagreement :-):
1) the 240/700's are superb for do-it-yourself maintenance. As longitudinal engine, RWD cars, virtually everything is within easy reach and dismantleable, and as the red-block engines were so common, parts are readily available both new (from dealers) and used from p-n-p yards. Further, particularly for 240s the brakes are virtually bulletproof (and still to this day, better-than-most) because they use solidly mounted calipers (no slide pin that needs constant attention and assurance of lubrication), pads that can be replaced from on top without unbolting the calipers, etc.). The 240's and 700's are virtually erector-sets, easily worked on by anyone.
Further, these red-block engines are the last of the non-interference engines -- no fear if the timing belt lets go!
In contrast, the 850 was the start of the FWD cars (and white block interference engines). The engine/transmission is harder to access components, and the timing belt is crucial to prevent costly destruction of the engine. The brakes (like the 700s) are floating calipers, and require more work and maintenance....
2) I doubt that the 850s will be found to last as long (mileage) as 700s, let alone 240s. Already, if you go to a Volvo used car lot, the 850s are a dime a dozen -- wonder why? That isn't the case for 240s and 700's in comparable condition (aside from miles)....
3) Here I must admit that a stock 850, and especially a 855 or other R-version can run rings around a stock 240 or a 700. But I think a lot has to do with the tires. If you put IPD stuff (bars, braces) and wide wheels/tires on the 240 (like I have) or 700, it'll keep up with the 850 [I've spent days driving S40 and S60 as loaners, though, and they are something else despite being FWD].
Naturally, the newer Volvos are slightly better than earlier ones, particularly regarding side-impact protection. The SIPS in the later 700s is probably close to equal with later cars (if it weren't for side air bags, and the 850's don't have that either, as far as I know). And I think that even a mere 240 can be the equal of later cars in front/rear collisions -- they certainly show well in accident pictures I've seen on this forum, with and without the drivers side airbags of the last few years on the 240s....
4) Going in snow -- I don't think that FWD is all that great in snow (based on owning a Honda Accord and a Shelby GLH Turbo), except for those who don't know how to drive! A skilled RWD driver can go anywhere a FWD driver can go. The best thing is to have a set (4) of real snow tires!
And much more on all these topics.
Much more can be said (and some may disagree). So is there any one area that you are most interested in?
|
