The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Bars have to be part of a system! S90-V90

Just because one Volvo model used a certain bar size doesn't mean another model should. There are many variables in a suspension system such as where the bar is attached and what mechanical advantage it has to the wheel that can greatly alter the effective bar size.

In the later 960,s the stock front bar is the same diameter as the earlier 960 but the attachment is directly to the strut instead of the control arm so its effect is greater.

The rear bar on the Multi-link II system with the composit transvers leaf is of 3 stock sizes depending on the car/wagon/Nivomat species. Its attachment points and mounting are nothing like the front so the effect can't be compared.

For a given bar shape, the stifness increases as the square of the diameter as I remember.
--
'96 965, 16' wheels, Michelin Pilot Sports, rear 18mm bar + Koni, 201 HP cams, 134K. Put 200K on '85 745 TD.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.