The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Metal Flame Trap Insert 900

The metal coil style was the original design. If there was a lot of crankcase vapour condensation it easily plugged and needed to be checked/cleaned/replaced regularly. The plastic one with the holes is the upgraded design. It doesn't plug up as easily and is easily cleaned with a drill bit if you don't have a replacement handy. I didn't think Volvo was still selling the old metal kind. For whatever reason, I've lately been seeing the metal design advertised a lot in the aftermarket. If you change/Clean the flame trap element regularly it doesn't matter which style you use. Turbo engines do not use a flame trap element. Many people happily run non-turbos without the flame trap element.
--
Dave -940's, prev 740/240/140/120 Never overestimate what little I know.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.