The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

rear axle ratio change??? 200 1993

John,

I would agree with Jorell. I swapped a 3.31 into my son's 83 244Ti w/ AW71 in an attempt to get better MPG and make the engine less busy at highway speed.
It calmed it down on the highway but I've seen only about 1-2 MPG increase with the 3.3 rear end. Off the line performance really has suffered. I just pulled the 3.3 and installed it in my 86 244DL w/M46. The 86 original 3.31 rear end was damaged and this is a direct replacement for the old diff. I'll going to try a 3.73 as a compromise between the original 3.9 and the now removed 3.3 on the 244Ti. I think the 3.73 is about the best choice behind the AW, at least for N/A 240s. A good tune up, clean air filter, properly inflated tires, real synthetic oil(engine & rear end)and ATF will probably get you more MPG and certainly demand a lot less effort than a rear end swap.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.