The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

740 engine bay is longer 700 1989

Hall sensors and CPS are not compatible, but I don't think having both and using only one (with the computer it's designed for) would cause any problem. The Hall-sensor/CPS change had nothing to do with the different car models, but rather with the switch from LH 2.2 to 2.4 (and later Regina). LH 2.2 has a Hall sensor on the dizzy (either rear mounted in a 740 or side mounted in a 240) while 2.4 and Regina have a CPS. But I think if you used a dizzy with a Hall sensor in a later car it would work fine, you just wouldn't connect anything to sensor.

What I have heard about the relative benefits is that the rear mounted dizzy is better because it is a direct connection to the cam rather than having to be linked to it via gears.
--
Andy in St. Paul - '91 745 227K mi, '91 745 210K, '90 744 194K, all Rex-Regina; '86 745 GLE M46 230K; past 240s






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.