The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Worth it to change to vented rotors? 200 1982

posted by  walrus3 on  Mon Dec 4 01:03 CST 2006
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Mon Dec 2 14:20 CST 2013
[RELATED]

If/when you have to replace your rotors you MIGHT do that if you find it
worthwhile for other reasons.
I still have the old, original nonvented rotors on my '69 164 and have never
needed to change the front ones - a rear one got damaged by a plugged brake
hose so I did put a new on on there back in about 1981.
Also still have the original calipers and seals on the front - work fine.
As a West Indian friend used to say, "Don't trouble trouble if trouble don't
trouble you!"
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.