The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

142s common? rare? In-between? 140-160

Hey I'm on your side, I have 1x 142, 2x 144's & 3x 164's. I also have a '83 240, the only thing I like about it is the 4-speed auto. Nearly every thing about it is a disappointment compared to the older pushrod powered cars.

How do you arrive at a 140 being the same size or bigger than a 240?

Like SRC said. The '73 & '74 140's are the same size as the 240 on the inside & the earlier models give noticeable more leg room in the front.

240's are fairly average cars when you are use to the early 140's. Not only are they bigger in all the wrong places, they managed to build a 'more modern' OHC engine with aluminium cross flow head that is both heavier & less powerful. The strut front end is a bit average too & the rear suspension mods are a bit of a disaster.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.