The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Not convinced 200

I'm not convinced that the newer gasoline powered cars get significantly better mileage.

For example, in today's Toronto Sun, they have an article about the new 2007 VW Rabbit. 2.5 liter inline 5 cyl has 150 hp. With a 5 speed manual it gets 10.7 liters/100 km city and 7.2 liters/100 km hwy. No mention of real world city-hwy fuel consumption.

That translates to 9.3 km/l city (100/10.7) and 13.9 km/l hwy. In mileage that works out to 22 mpg city (9.3 divided by 1.6km/mi times 3.78l/gal) and 32.8 mpg hwy.

Considering that the Rabbit is a smaller car (I don't know its weight), should we be complaining about our 240s mileage?
--
1980 245 Canadian B21A with SU carb and M46 trans in Brampton, Ont.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.