The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Opinions on 1975 164e ? 140-160

My view, as a longtime 164 owner (since 1971) is that the considerations
are two: Condition and transmission. I am not interested in a BW35 auto,
but the condition of the body and the mechanical workings are very important
too. If it is rusty in very many places, it is probably not worth messing with,
other than a parts car for a body in better shape. Likewise if the engine
or tranny is bad it is also not worthwhile. Having said that, the 75 is a special
year as it is the only year of any Volvo that had both D-jet fuel injection and
electronic ignition. It also had some other features that didn't show up in
earlier models. It was somewhat lower-powered than earlier models but could be
easily brought up with a little work on the ports and the compression ratio,
and maybe a better cam (D or VV71, for example).
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.